SpaceCritter
NES Member
That is absolutely correct reasoning.They did. But if they have an asylum claim, regardless of whether or not you or I think it's spurious, then they're not "felons" until a court says they are. Hell, even if they're not claiming asylum, they're still entitled to due process under the Constitution, just like you or I.
Convictions in court matter in terms of ganking peoples' RKBA. Short of that, the right is absolute in accordance with 2A.
It will NOT be how it's interpreted. It will be:
"This illegal is allowed to be armed cuz the Court sez."
while simultaneously
"...but YOU are not, cuz these other Courts have said This Thing Here."
while simultaneously
"...but YOU are not, cuz these other Courts have said This Thing Here."