Now who's the liberal? Aren't they the ones who call people names instead of providing an argument that supports their position?
And I do understand the need for military training. I just don't understand the need for it to occur over people. Why here and not some desolate training range? I...
Nope. Not sarcasm. What's the benefit for a flyover? So people can say "Ooo Ah?"
Saying it's training doesn't sway me. Training over populated areas is negligence.
I realize the probability is low but the consequences are high. How many initially killed and then how many killed in the stampede...
No to mention jeopardizing the safety of thousands of people. One of these from the 104th went down in the woods of Pennsylvania a while back. One also took out a car on the pike (I think) in the 60's or 70's. These planes have no business stationed/operating near populated areas. Nobody needs a...
Is this some kind of OT scam or did all of their firearms training really happen 12-8 a.m?
ETA: Maybe this is why they were so transparent. Look at that piddly gun sale over there and not at this multi-hundreds of thousands pension padding OT scam.
I thought we were discussing a small segment of society forcing their views on the majority of society. As far as treating each other right, nobody's talking about setting bag limits and allowing these people to be hunted in the streets. Ask the cake baker how they got "treated in turn."
So the state's argument is that they are not self defense because no recorded use but they are military weapons because they have no recorded military use but look like military weapons that do have a recorded use?