the second point in Rodriguez v. San Jose kind of sounds like a petition to have a case heard even if it could be mooted by removal of whatever caused the issue? (example- NYC removed the transport ban so the case was moot, this seems to be asking that cases like that still be heard?).
Viewing all those cases and their questions, it seems the most common theme is "outside the home" in a licensing and carry perspective. The cynical part of me has doubts, but i hope the second theme of all 10 of those cases ("in common use") rears its head. It would be nice to tie those loose...
this is also touched on here US Supreme Court OT 2019
TL/DR NYSRPA case could yield a narrow scrutiny level that 2A cases need to be ruled on, many cases would have to be looked at again with a narrower scope of scrutiny, so SCOTUS may be holding Worman to send back to be seen with a narrower...
two things right off the bat.
-"used disproportianately in mass public shootings and killings of police officers..." facts to back that up? becuase FBI crime stats negate that.
-"barred the transfer and possession..." you could transfer a pre ban just the same as you can now, except for dealer...
"The final judgment reflects a clear error of law that would work a manifest injustice if not altered or amended."
[rofl]love the dig on the douche judge
i thought he was being kinda douchey when and how he said it, but he raised a good point.
a guy was talking one day that he was a gun owner and a cop and if you pulled the "boating accident" line, he would ask to see the receipt from the transaction reporting lost firearms. no production=...