There is the global motion for mistrial with prejudice. I think this request for mistrial without prejudice is on this narrow issue.The defense had previously moved for a mistrial with prejudice. Did they change their tack on that?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
There is the global motion for mistrial with prejudice. I think this request for mistrial without prejudice is on this narrow issue.The defense had previously moved for a mistrial with prejudice. Did they change their tack on that?
I'm glad I didn't retake the bar exam and just went into computers. I feel like I *ahem* dodged a bullet.
I have seen no Conservatives speak against this Judge only Left Wing Whack Jobs. And his life has been threatened, is that ok?If that is your take away, then you have not been watching. And stop with the "Only liberals are attacking the judge" BS. If you think that then you are not fully informed.
Leftists always just assume the other side is doing the same bs that they are.I have seen no Conservatives speak against this Judge only Left Wing Whack Jobs. And his life has been threatened, is that ok?
I respect your opinion but I must disagree.Despite the fact that he thinks I am a moron (not holding it against him), I don't think that is what he is saying here. The judge seems paralyzed from ruling in a way that may be scrutinized by the dickheads that are going to scrutinize him anyway. This sort of thing happens everyday but we don't see it because most cases don't have any public attention. Defendants, regardless of people's feeling of guilt generally, get screwed by the limitless resources of the state and despite the constitutional presumption of innocence, there is a practical presumption of guilt.
You haven't been watching the Rikieta Law panel then. They are all ripping the judge for his tepidness.I have seen no Conservatives speak against this Judge only Left Wing Whack Jobs. And his life has been threatened, is that ok?
FifyLeftists always just accuse the other side of doing the same bs that they are.
There is the global motion for mistrial with prejudice. I think this request for mistrial without prejudice is on this narrow issue.
I agree, that is why I am jumping into my computer screen.This is still the improper argument. The matter is one of accused double murder, with the defendant spending the rest of his life in jail, and the district attorney's office is treating potentially exculpatory evidence like a TikTok.
Despite the fact that he thinks I am a moron (not holding it against him), I don't think that is what he is saying here. The judge seems paralyzed from ruling in a way that may be scrutinized by the dickheads that are going to scrutinize him anyway. This sort of thing happens everyday but we don't see it because most cases don't have any public attention. Defendants, regardless of people's feeling of guilt generally, get screwed by the limitless resources of the state and despite the constitutional presumption of innocence, there is a practical presumption of guilt.
I have not but I do cringe with Law Firms in general, especially ones from MN. I really don't see what they are talking about, tepid the Judge has not been.You haven't been watching the Rikeita Law panel then. They are all ripping the judge for his tepidness.
There is the global motion for mistrial with prejudice. I think this request for mistrial without prejudice is on this narrow issue.
But here is where the limitless resources come into play. If the case is retried, no sweat off Binger's sack (Krous's is probably always sweating). They will not think twice about retrying. It is not their money, it is the state of Wisconsin's money - the people of Wisconsin's money. Rittenhouse will have to go through this whole ordeal again, with real money being spent - if raised, and while enjoying his constitutional presumption of innocence he will have his freedom curtailed and every aspect of his existence scrutinized.I have never said you were a moron. That would be someone with an IQ below 75. You are clearly not that. You are a defense attorney, so you're easily an 85.
The limitless resources of the state were wasted here. It seems little or no investigation, prep, or presentation work was done. Maybe WI is out of money?
I have spent a lot of time in WI. And, somehow, this entire case fully replicates the experience of living in WI. Or watching Green Acres.
At this point: no effing idea.As an attorney what's your best guess to the outcome given the length of time the jury has been out?
Personally I thought it was a slam dunk not guilty. But the jury taking this amount of time makes me wonder if they see it that way?
I have not but I do cringe with Law Firms in general, especially ones from MN. I really don't see what they are talking about, tepid the Judge has not been.
The judge made a lot of noise, but when it came to making rulings, especially on the admission of the video without proper testimony regarding the authenticity and reliability, he was very weak.I really don't see what they are talking about, tepid the Judge has not been.
They've been Gotten To, and I've been saying all along.As an attorney what's your best guess to the outcome given the length of time the jury has been out?
Personally I thought it was a slam dunk not guilty. But the jury taking this amount of time makes me wonder if they see it that way?
It's likely they have all been threatened. Hell, they make threats daily to the media and nothing is ever done about it.
Judges typically take a VERY dim view not only of not following rules of evidence and proper trial procedures, but anything that smells even REMOTELY of jury tampering or intimidation gets wrath bigly. Given the extremely high profile nature of this case, and the likelihood (not mere probability) someone would attempt to intimidate jurors, the fact there was no sequestration is, frankly, astounding to me.
Mayhaps cuz they have. And not just by the BLM/Antifa thugs, either.It's likely they have all been threatened. Hell, they make threats daily to the media and nothing is ever done about it.
They really don't need to be "gotten to" they knew the deal going in, they are likely targets if they acquit.They've been Gotten To, and I've been saying all along.
Yes, but by whom?They really don't need to be "gotten to" they knew the deal going in, they are likely targets if they acquit.
ANTIFAYes, but by whom?![]()