17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha

A mistrial for the actions of third parties not the state would never be with prejudice. They'd look like fools for even suggesting it.
When I was commenting on being more aggressive, I was referring to the defense mostly just sitting there when the judge was feeling "queasy" at various times and letting the prosecution filibuster the judge into not doing anything at the moment.
 
Last edited:
You can not get a mistrial over a part of a case.

I interpreted him as really meaning to ask: Can you enter multiple motions for mistrial based on different aspects of the case, and the judge has to evaluate each one independently.

Now in THIS case, we have two motions for mistrial (should be around 57 more...) one with prejudice and one without.

My silly question of the day is, could the judge grant a mistrial without prejudice and then not consider/rule on the OTHER motion with prejudice attached?
 
I still can't how much of an idiot the prosecutor is.

Also. Where did the optic go on the AR-15?

Can't wait for a juror to complain about being flagged.

I'm curious to know if Binger personally verified the weapon was clear before he started pointing it at people or if he just grabbed it off the table and started swinging it around.

Was this a potential Baldwin moment? Perhaps the Bailiffs were plinking in the back parking lot earlier in the day. Ok, not going to happen but still, you always verify before you start screwing around.
 
I'm curious to know if Binger personally verified the weapon was clear before he started pointing it at people or if he just grabbed it off the table and started swinging it around.

Was this a potential Baldwin moment? Perhaps the Bailiffs were plinking in the back parking lot earlier in the day. Ok, not going to happen but still, you always verify before you start screwing around.

The Judge made the detective check it again. He has made the detective that has been there the whole time check, and recheck, the rifle repeatedly. Once where he said, "before lunch? check it again". [rockon]
 
The Judge made the detective check it again. He has made the detective that has been there the whole time check, and recheck, the rifle repeatedly. Once where he said, "before lunch? check it again". [rockon]
Did the detective announce “Cold gun” so the entire set.. er, umm, Courtroom could hear it?
 
Having watched the segment of the car lot owner testifying, and then the other pictures and videos. I would suggest the following on the part of the ADA, Suborning Perjury, Withholding Exculpatory Evidence, and possibly, Intimidation of a witness. The last being that we have issues with your car lots and we can over look that.
As far as the Witness goes, Just plain Perjury.
 
Last edited:
Gotta have a friday acquittal so BLM can have a whole weekend to chimp out
View attachment 543897
Don't forget the McMichael Trial (for the killing of Ahmad Aubrey) is also happening right now. From what I have seen that one should definitely be GUILTY on all counts. Maybe they can get that verdict announced to calm people down first (as Aubrey - black - was killed by 3 white dudes) and then "sneak" out a NOT GUILTY for Rittenhouse.

Nahhhh. the scumbags will still riot and loot
 
Don't forget the McMichael Trial (for the killing of Ahmad Aubrey) is also happening right now. From what I have seen that one should definitely be GUILTY on all counts. Maybe they can get that verdict announced to calm people down first (as Aubrey - black - was killed by 3 white dudes) and then "sneak" out a NOT GUILTY for Rittenhouse.

Nahhhh. the scumbags will still riot and loot
Well, they have to now. Can't let all those bricks go to waste!
 
Did the detective announce “Cold gun” so the entire set.. er, umm, Courtroom could hear it?

He could have a chamber flag in the MFer and be screaming "its not loaded" and i still would not want to be muzzle swept or flat out aimed at. Moreover by a dipshit that spent time arguing that "full meta jackets were used because 1 bullet can kill multiple people" and "hollow points explode"
 
The scumbags will indeed probably still riot and loot...but...I'll go out on a limb and bet they won't attack any occupied gun shops, or the local shooting range, or any...(etc etc etc)....

Just sayin' 😉
Now I’m picturing a Spartacus scene with a bunch of AR toting people in jeans and green tee shirts out there saying “I am Kyle.”
 
People always think being not guilty is being found "innocent". If he wins the left will always say the DA failed to prove their case.
Very true.

Have you been watching the Rekieta crew? Maybe you could make a guest appearance if you could be of any input.

Their coverage of the trial and further analysis by guys like Rob Gruler has been fascinating.

Is there a list of any sort that you could share regarding cases of dgu/ self defense with a firearm in Massachusetts where the LTC holder isn’t scrutinized like Kyle and isn’t charged? I recall a shooting where the attacker died down near the aquarium around 10 years ago, but do not recall how that turned out.
 
I've been wondering ever since I heard that phrase...WTF does it even mean? It sounds like three year old speak...but then, given the source, why should I be surprised?

new·speak
/ˈn(y)o͞oˌspēk/
Learn to pronounce

noun

  1. ambiguous euphemistic language used chiefly in political propaganda.
    "“deterrence” is just Newspeak for plain old threatening"
 
Back
Top Bottom