17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha


Originally filed only against the city and the PD, and only for $10M, and it's a weak conspiracy claim. They are fishing for a settlement and added Kyle for the publicity it will bring. The article doesn't even mention anything about "wrongful death", just
"In broad strokes they are saying [Huber's] constitutional rights to be free of excessive force were violated because law enforcement worked in concert with Kyle Rittenhouse to intimidate and ultimately to kill peaceful protesters who were there to exercise their rights," she said.
 
I'm just some guy sitting on a couch and I can see many lies from the family in that article.

I can see the guy was a loser that constantly started fights that led to months in jail in two different instances.
A guy that couldn't find a job.
A man child that whined so mush about jail being boring that he demanded the jail get comic books for him to look at the pictures.. I wonder what kind of comics they were.... Anime?
Its on camera him striking Rittenhouse with the skateboard.

Then the big lie that has nothing to do with any of it.
The police worked with armed people that were trying to stop the burning and looting by "funneling" the protestors towards the armed ones.
Huber was not being funneled but chasing after Kyle.
Their argument is like saying Huber is not guilty of robbing the bank because others told him that there is a lot of money in there, and Tv and movies also show a lot of money and some videos even show how easy it is to rob banks.
Then when he walked in to the bank, he could see the vault and the counters pointed him facing the vault, so he was forced to rob the bank.


RC
 
This is what some parts of our society has "progressed" into. Your dear sweet baby boy/girl does something stupid and/or illegal and pays for it. You immediately sue everyone in sight for the actions they had to take to protect themselves from your precious angelic kid.

Something like this is happening in Springfield. A man who had mental problems attacked several police officers with a knife, stabbed one in the face several times, and the other officers had to shoot, killing him.

Immediately the Black community, lead by several black ministers, are accusing the police of killing him. Even after the family and ministers were shown the body cam film which showed the attack, they continued to claim that the police were in the wrong and the "community" failed him by not giving him the help he needed.
 
Immediately the Black community, lead by several black ministers, are accusing the police of killing him. Even after the family and ministers were shown the body cam film which showed the attack, they continued to claim that the police were in the wrong and the "community" failed him by not giving him the help he needed.

The "minister" acting as the family's spokesman, one Charles Stokes, is a former cocaine dealer who got a woman murdered during a deal gone wrong and fingered a wholly innocent man that spent 27 years in jail for his lie.

This is the type of "civic leaders" the black community have chosen to rally behind.
 
He's responsible," John Huber said of Rittenhouse, who fired at Anthony Huber after Huber struck him with a skateboard during a foot chase. Rittenhouse "killed two people. He became an active shooter and my son tried to stop him," John Huber said. "Unfortunately, he wasn't able to stop him, and he lost his life in the process."



The father is a nut, he gave the middle finger on one of the pre trial bail hearings. He’s an angr6 and unhinged person, it’s not surprising his son was the same.

The criminal trial jury didn’t buy the active shooter BS, in fact the jury found Rittenhouse NG of the grosskruetz and Huber counts very quickly, The last count they decided was the rosenbaum count. In the criminal trial Hubers violent history wasn’t allowed because that was something Rittenhouse didn’t know at the time. In a civil trial that history comes in. The burden of proof is lower but the ‘he was just trying to stop an active shooter’ bs is going to be counter acted with he was a violent person who did prison time who was being violent again.

Even if he “thought” he was stopping an active shooter, if Rittenhouse legally shot rosenbaum, Hubers thoughts are irrelevant. He had no idea what was happening but for what people were yelling. That’s why you stay out of things that don’t involve you. If Rittenhouse was legal in the shooting of rosenbaum, Huber was committing a battery with a dangerous or deadly weapon.

Huber wasn’t on camera starting fires etc but he was on camera flipping off the cops and mouthing off during the night.


I seriously doubt Kenosha will settle any of these lawsuits. None of the cities employees were directly involved in the deaths and I doubt they want to set a precedence of settling in cases like this. After it got dark, people were out there to riot, start fires or watch it. I doubt the jurors are going to have much sympathy for the dead. They put themselves in that situation and assumed the risk.
 
The a**h*** never falls far from the crazy tree.

Here’s the lawyer. He repeats the lie about Jacob Blake being unarmed among other things.


View: https://youtu.be/vjg65GPdd3k




The father is an A hole.
View: https://youtu.be/Px5vcTN0xzk


Yeah, if Rittenhouse were black he wouldn’t have gotten bail. Heres a case Andrew branca and Rekieta law are covering now in Wisconsin, Shooter claims self defense like rittenhouse. After the shooting the shooter fled the state and was caught 6 months later in Kentucky. He has $250,000 for bail, Rittenhouse was $2 million

 

Kyle Rittenhouse’s rifle will be destroyed at Wisconsin crime lab​

The AR-15-style rifle that Kyle Rittenhouse used to shoot three people during a 2020 street protest will be destroyed by the state of Wisconsin and not returned.

The agreement, made among prosecutors, Rittenhouse and Dominick Black — the man who purchased the rifle — was announced Friday morning in court.

Kyle Rittenhouse’s rifle will be destroyed at Wisconsin crime lab
 

"He's responsible," John Huber said of Rittenhouse, who fired at Anthony Huber after Huber struck him with a skateboard during a foot chase. Rittenhouse "killed two people. He became an active shooter and my son tried to stop him," John Huber said. "Unfortunately, he wasn't able to stop him, and he lost his life in the process."

The problem may have started a little earlier in young Anthony's life, like his childhood rearing.
 
... - Adams will take the first-world sh¡thole he inherited from DeBlasio and screw things up even worse. A NYPD patrolman was shot in the head early New Year's Day: ... the Daily Mail quotes the mayor and commissioner using the shooting as an opportunity to tout gun control. ...
In all fairness the new mayor hasnt even been in office for a week......
If he hasnt begun to actually correct some of deblasio's most egregious bs in a month then......
It's been more than a month,
and this is Hizzoner's latest brain fart:

Social media needs to reduce gun violence
by banning music videos where rappers hurl threats at each other.

This guy must be jealous of Chicago outclassing Fun City's murder rate,
and is desperate to catch up.

Meanwhile, the shade of David Dinkins looks at this and is all like...
6506dk.jpg
 
It's been more than a month,
and this is Hizzoner's latest brain fart:

Social media needs to reduce gun violence
by banning music videos where rappers hurl threats at each other.

This guy must be jealous of Chicago outclassing Fun City's murder rate,
and is desperate to catch up.

Meanwhile, the shade of David Dinkins looks at this and is all like...

Adams is a NYC liberal democrat, anyone who thinks he’ll be Rudy from 1993 to 2001 is crazy. Adams campaigned on going after guns, he supports vaccine mandates, vaccine proof to go to a gym, restaurant, sports event etc.

Adams will probably be better than the insane leftists and deblasio on crime, bail reform but he’s not going to be very different than deblasio on 85% of the issues.
 
It's been more than a month,
and this is Hizzoner's latest brain fart:

Social media needs to reduce gun violence
by banning music videos where rappers hurl threats at each other.

This guy must be jealous of Chicago outclassing Fun City's murder rate,
and is desperate to catch up.

Meanwhile, the shade of David Dinkins looks at this and is all like...
6506dk.jpg
21st century gangsta ramp and Sista Soulja from HW Bush all over again. Old retreads to shit that never worked in the first place.
 
No leadership from him.
Maybe his administration will be dragged kicking and screaming to some solutions.

I think he wants the crime issues corrected but that’s the only somewhat moderate area of his. He has criticized the state legislature and asked them to fix their moronic bail reform law they passed a few years ago that lets criminals out hours after crimes but the legislature is very left and probably won’t change it.

That’s a big problem going forward for blue cities especially in blue states. Even if a mayor wants to do something about crime, if you have a DA who won’t prosecute then it’s impossible to reduce crime. Cops won’t bother making arrests but even if they do, the DA drops charges. In the blue states you have crazy state laws being passed in addition to the joke DAs.

Ironically, the worse crime is, the lower gun control will poll. Dems are obsessed with gun control but the increase in crime is a big obstacle. They’re making more pro self defense, pro 2A each day.
 
I think he wants the crime issues corrected but that’s the only somewhat moderate area of his. He has criticized the state legislature and asked them to fix their moronic bail reform law they passed a few years ago that lets criminals out hours after crimes but the legislature is very left and probably won’t change it.
How high does the average Donk have to rise in the Donk food chain
before they understand that Donk solutions don't solve problems - they compound them?

I'm sure some are power-mad cynics straight out of university with their PolySci degree.
But so many 10's, 100's of thousands push the Party line that they don't all know better.
 
How high does the average Donk have to rise in the Donk food chain
before they understand that Donk solutions don't solve problems - they compound them?

I'm sure some are power-mad cynics straight out of university with their PolySci degree.
But so many 10's, 100's of thousands push the Party line that they don't all know better.

They just don’t grasp reality, they think because they wish it to happen it will.
 
Saw this on Tucker last night. The kid was a train wreck…..started drinking from a bottle of water almost immediately. To bad he wasn’t more well prepared to speak about the lawsuits.
 
Saw this on Tucker last night. The kid was a train wreck…..started drinking from a bottle of water almost immediately. To bad he wasn’t more well prepared to speak about the lawsuits.
That wasn't a good look. He needs to lay low and let the attorneys do their thing.
 
Nick Sandman got $300 mil from CNN and then it wasn't enough so he sued MSNBC and then HuffPo. How much was the payout, is he a self made billionaire by now? What are Kyles chances?

No one knows what Sandman got from CNN, NBC, Washington post, etc. settlements are always confidential and undisclosed. Any number given is pure wild speculation. The only people who know are the lawyers, Sandman and a few executives at the companies.
 
No one knows what Sandman got from CNN, NBC, Washington post, etc. settlements are always confidential and undisclosed. Any number given is pure wild speculation. The only people who know are the lawyers, Sandman and a few executives at the companies.
How do they hide it on the shareholder's report, etc?

If CNN had actually paid out 17% of their annual gross revenue to a single individual, seems like that'd be tough to hide on the balance sheet.
 
... settlements are always confidential and undisclosed. Any number given is pure wild speculation. The only people who know are the lawyers, Sandman and a few executives at the companies.
Yeah, no.

Whether a defendant who is willing to cave
has enough leverage to obtain confidentiality
depends on how hard they think the plaintiff
will kick their ass if it goes to trial.

 
Yeah, no.

Whether a defendant who is willing to cave
has enough leverage to obtain confidentiality
depends on how hard they think the plaintiff
will kick their ass if it goes to trial.


I should have specified. The lawsuits against media like this, they always insist on confidentiality
 
Back
Top Bottom