Another author writing dribble

[aileron]

Says 2nd is not an individual right. Might be good to write him.

http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070104/OPINION01/701040347/1035/archive

Im going to refer him to this paper:

http://www.virginiainstitute.org/pub...r_on_const.php

 

[MarkM]

http://www.virginiainstitute.org/publications/primer_on_const.php

Your link was broken. Try this one.

 

[matt1956]

this in itself should show that it IS and Individual right, "Each of our 13 colonies required all able-bodied adult males to have a firearm ready to be used when called. Governments were suspicious of standing armies"

But maybe I'm still just "reading into it"

 

[calsdad]

this in itself should show that it IS and Individual right, "Each of our 13 colonies required all able-bodied adult males to have a firearm ready to be used when called. Governments were suspicious of standing armies"

But maybe I'm still just "reading into it"

It was not "government" that were suspicious of standing armies. It was the people that were suspicious of the goverments' standing armies. Once again this alleged lawyer has gotten his facts wrong.