If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
I think that the 5906 is vastly superior to the SIG P 226 out of the box.
S&W 5906s show up occasionally advertised by on line dealers, some for about $300. I think they are used LE guns. Try CDNN.
My father had one when he was a police officer, he said during his primary tests he shot almost 2k rounds before needing any service...which was just a touch of oil and it was back to running. He also said it was the finest handling pistol (aside from his CZ-75) that he had ever used as well as one of the most accurate. He hasn't fibbed to me yet about a gun. If i ever come across one i will definitely purchase one! That all stainless gun will be nice and heavy, so follow up shots would be ultra easy
Dom
In response to another post on field stripping. I find the 5906 and the SIG P226 to be about the same in terms of ease (or difficulty) to field strip. The SIG is a lot easier to detail (complete) disassemble than the 5906. I came to this conclusion after detail disassembling both pistols several times.
The only problem could be getting one shipped into MA from an out of state dealer. I'm reasonably sure that even though it's on the roster, it would have to be in MA before the effective date (1998) to be legal for a dealer to sell. Then again, since I find the rules incredibly confusing, I could be completely wrong about that.
Both the Beretta 92 and the Sig 226 have take down levers, the 5906 does not, and field strips the way you would field strip a 1911 or BHP by removing the slide stop. I personally find that not quite as easy as the take-down lever. When reassembling the pistol, one must engage the slide on the slide rails, there is a lever that remains up by the hammer, and care must be taken to push that lever down while bringing back the slide. That can be tricky and I have seen novice pistol shooters have a lot more trouble with field stripping and reassembly than the Beretta or the Sig. Since you detail strip the weapons, you are probably pretty handy and mechanically inclined. One reason that the 459 was rejected by the Army Pistol Board was that field stripping and re-assembling the pistol (which field strips just like a 3rd Gen gun) was deemed more difficult than the other two pistols. Frankly, while I can field strip all three guns with absolutely no issues, I still think that the 3rd Gen S&W is a little harder. YMMV.
No comment on your interpretation of the law. All S&W were in the state on the day they were made... no?
No more buying used guns from out of state from other dealers or on gun auctions unless they are on the new roster list AND they were made prior to 10/21/98.
New handguns that comply with all MA regs and laws can be transferred in.
Couldn't agree more on the 3rd Gens. I had a 4043 as a duty gun and liked it quite a bit. We've since gone to the m&p, but I'd be lying if I said it didn't hold a soft spot in my heart, even if it was a fortay.They tend to be under-appreciated, esp by the cops who were being won over to Glocks which became almost cult-like at one time.