Article: Bloomberg apologist makes no pretense of reasonable suspicion for stop-and-f

Re: Article: Bloomberg

They don't need reasonable suspicion. We have a flock of serfs demanding to be frisked. I am being told all the time I am part of the problem asserting my rights. If people like me would just participate the horrific attacks would be avoided.
 
"with over half a million stops per year--and over half a million of those stopped being black or Hispanic"

So... are they only stopping people with skin darker than mine, or what?

I seriously hope Bloomberg and all his cronies die in a fire.
 
Yes, according to Bloomberg, because the race of criminals reported to the people for violent crimes in NYC are 91% black and hispanic, that it is only fair to stop and frisk people in those proportions by skin color.

In fairness, they may also look to see if the people they are stopping look suspicious in other ways. I actually would favor stop and frisk, plus a savage beating, for anyone wearing saggy pants, or baseball cap at a sideways angle, but that's just my own personal prejudice.

The 4th ammendment apparently does not apply to NYC.
 
We should call it what it is: "Walking while black searches."
 
Back
Top Bottom