If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
While I am not a certified expert, I am against putting my finger on the trigger while a gun is still in my pants.
Responsible folks who conceal are using holsters.
Really? Why is that? I almost never use a holster. I'd say it's 50/50 if I do. I also don't carry back up mags, flashlight, or a knife.
Here's another good read, from haaarvaard
Harvard study reveals gun control counterproductive | Small Government Times . com
reduces or eliminates any potential ND.
OK, if that works for you. My guns dont go off unless I pull the trigger. ND's only happen when triggers are pulled. My guns dont go off just because I touch it - or it touches me.
Right. Which is what holsters prevent.
Now, I am confused. You are saying a holster prevents ND's? Really?
I thought following the safety rules is all i need.
What about my AR, I don't holster that, never had an ND.
Look up ND -- I've never seen a definition or example that included a holster.
Not trying to be argumentative , I just dont understand where/when a holster replaced the safety rules, or common sense.
Carrying a gun without a holster is, IMO, negligent.
OK, good to know. I carry a .45 - locked and cocked. It has two (2) mechanical safeties. Then there is me, which I consider more reliable then any mechanical safety.
Really difficult (impossible) to get the gun to go bang unless you pull the trigger, proven fact.
Carrying without a holster adds unnecessary risks.
Now, I am confused. You are saying a holster prevents ND's? Really?
I thought following the safety rules is all i need.
What about my AR, I don't holster that, never had an ND.
Look up ND -- I've never seen a definition or example that included a holster.
Not trying to be argumentative , I just dont understand where/when a holster replaced the safety rules, or common sense.