If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
MA Executive Office of Public Safety:
501 CMR 7.04: Criteria for Placement on Approved Firearms Roster
Section (2) Functional Equivalent. A Firearm model shall be deemed to satisfy the testing requirements if another firearm model made by the same manufacturer is the functional design equivalent of a firearm model that has satisfactorily completed the required tests, provided that the approved independent testing laboratory certifies that the firearm model is the functional design equivalent of another model already tested, and provides a written explanation for its reasoning appended with all supporting documentation used to reach its conclusion to the Secretary and to the GCAB.
Does this mean that the 232 SL and the 232 (blued) are thus both approved, but only the SL is listed?
If not, I would think it's due to the frame difference... I understand the blued model has an alloy frame...if you were to look up under the laws the restrictions of testing, it's possible the frame or the slide is not made of strong enough materials for approval, or, the weapon had too many malfunctions during testing.