AHM
NES Member
I take it you've already conducted an exhaustive search and concluded thatWhere’s the federal case law that says the MGL statue is unconstitutional?
it's not unconstitutional under the Massachusetts constitution?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I take it you've already conducted an exhaustive search and concluded thatWhere’s the federal case law that says the MGL statue is unconstitutional?
Equating having a sticker on your car to yelling fire in a theater, and you call me stupid? Lol.I don’t take that to be a valid response or challenge to my question so I’m gonna pretend I didn’t read that stupid shit and assume your trolling. You the same guy who yells “fire” in a movie theatre?
No. I legitimately asked for specific case law in response to an earlier post that declared the MGL statue unconstitutional.
By what? Are laws not assumed to be just until proven otherwise in the courts? I looked into it prior to asking and couldn’t find anything that substantiated that claim.
You failed to provide any specific cases, and said “Cuz the constitution” which I would’ve accepted as a valid argument had you articulated anything remotely reasonable after that.
FWIW I think the specific law is a load of crap and could be considered borderline unconstitutional but I need answers!!
It is a legitimate, but irrelevant, answer as your interpretation is of no interest to the authorities. Only those of a court of competent jurisdiction count.Again, I provided the specific part of the constitution that makes it unconstitutional. That’s a legitimate answer. I’d add section one of the 14th Amendment as well, otherwise that MGL has no purpose if it indeed were to be ruled applicable to the stickers.
MGL Ch. 268 §33: Falsely assuming to be justice of the peace or other officers
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be a justice of the peace, notary public, sheriff, deputy sheriff, medical examiner, associate medical examiner, constable, police officer, probation officer, or examiner, investigator or other officer appointed by the registrar of motor vehicles, or inspector, investigator or examiner of the department of public utilities or the department of telecommunications and cable, or investigator or other officer of the alcoholic beverages control commission, or investigator or other official of the bureau of special investigations, or examiner, investigator or other officer of the department of revenue, and acts as such or requires a person to aid or assist him in a matter pertaining to the duty of such officer, shall be punished by a fine of not more than four hundred dollars or by imprisonment for not more than one year.
Meanwhile,
"Massachusetts [still] doesn't encourage 'self-help'".
Which one? The false use of a trade emblem or impersonating a LEO?Has someone been convicted of that statute for having the sticker on their car?
Removing the "alcoholic beverage officer" stolen valor?Wow I better get to work cleaning up my linked in profile
Has someone been convicted of that statute for having the sticker on their car?
Craigslist ad for Police Association sticker leads to day in court
LOWELL — A Chelmsford man is in a sticky legal situation after allegedly posting for sale on Craigslist a Massachusetts Police Association windshield sticker that belongs to an Ashby police o…www.sentinelandenterprise.com
There is a follow-up article about the charges being dismissed behind a paywall:
Charges dropped in police-sticker sale
LOWELL — Prosecutors have dropped charges against a Chelmsford man who was accused last year of posting for sale on Craigslist a set of Massachusetts Police Association stickers that belong t…www.lowellsun.com
But, it shows that the system is serious about keeping these in the family.
Charges dropped in police-sticker sale
LOWELL — Prosecutors have dropped charges against a Chelmsford man who was accused last year of posting for sale on Craigslist a set of Massachusetts Police Association stickers that belong t…www.lowellsun.com
But, it shows that the system is serious about keeping these in the family.
There is a follow-up article about the charges being dismissed behind a paywall:
"“Essentially, the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office dismissed the case in order to avoid having to either concede the law was unconstitutional or to defend the blatantly unconstitutional law,” Spring said in a press release."
24 months, with only 2/3 to be served (so, 16 months) less 2 months already served.Sentence is 24 months.
24 months, with only 2/3 to be served (so, 16 months) less 2 months already served.
Total from here: 14 months.
She should have been acquitted, or probation at a maximum if a verdict had to stand. However, the judge was probably worried that the rubble from the resulting riots would be named after her.
Hell, I think she should just provide a transcript of the judge's statement as her whole appeal, not just a part of it.The judge, in sentencing, said no one disputes that potter draw the gun by mistake. All parties, the prosecution and defense agree she meant to draw her taser and did not know she had the gun in her hand.
And that’s a BIG deal. An accident where the person doesn’t know they are creating a reckless situation as what happened here, is not a crime. It’s an accident. The prosecution argued negligence in their closing and that’s a civil lawsuit, not a criminal charge. The judges own words in the sentencing will be used in the appeal.
This was not justice, there was never a crime and the politically motivated DA knows that.
The ooops defense does work from police in Framingham though.The judge, in sentencing, said no one disputes that potter draw the gun by mistake. All parties, the prosecution and defense agree she meant to draw her taser and did not know she had the gun in her hand.
And that’s a BIG deal. An accident where the person doesn’t know they are creating a reckless situation as what happened here, is not a crime. It’s an accident. The prosecution argued negligence in their closing and that’s a civil lawsuit, not a criminal charge. The judges own words in the sentencing will be used in the appeal.
This was not justice, there was never a crime and the politically motivated DA knows that.
The ooops defense does work from police in Framingham though.
Hell, I think she should just provide a transcript of the judge's statement as her whole appeal, not just a part of it.
The problem is that I don't see any way an appeal court gets to this before she finishes serving the 14 months. Which will be in solitary, unless someone gets a hair across his ass and decides to put her in general population as an additional punishment. While they're
letting bangers out "so that they don't get Covid".
It’s a hard job. But you can’t be that wrong doing it, most places now, what with cams everywhere.Former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter set to be released
Former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter, who accidentally killed Daunte Wright when she mistook her firearm for a taser during a traffic stop, is set to be released from prison on Monday, Fox News reports.
Former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter set to be released
Former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter, who accidentally killed Daunte Wright when she mistook her firearm for a taser duringwww.lawofficer.com