If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
The 50 000 rounds were carefully loaded on a truck. At the barracks, the 20 000 rounds were inventoried and sent to inspection, where the 5 000 rounds were analyzed. The 2 000 rounds were then sent back to the state police where it was decided that all 6 boxes of .32 and 4 boxes of 22 WMR would have to be destroyed.
Contrary to what most people are saying, the Duxbury Police are very gun friendly. The did what they had to do and I’m sure they didn’t like it more than anyone here. They can’t just turn a blind eye if they walk into a violation, they have to enforce it. The problem is with the state and the laws our politicians have passed, not the police.
Find that please and then blast her office with the article and her saying it.But didn't Maura say in court that you didn't need a license to just have stuff in a house last year or the year before?
Find that please and then blast her office with the article and her saying it.
The poor UPS delivery drivers must all be bomb squad certified with all the ammo they have at their distribution centers and on their trucks during these past few months!Oh no, call the bomb squad. Ammo, ammo everywhere. Typical small town c***s.
They probably want to run the numbers. The legalities are ambiguous about holding guns for someone else without the intent of a transfer, and not doing an eFA-10. Note there is nothing in MGL banning the loan of guns to a properly licensed individual.Still trying to figure out under why they felt they needed to confiscate the guns but found it perfectly acceptable to have a licensed relative take possession of the ammunition.
The problem is that with cameras, supervisors present, etc. the officer gets put in a box. Failure to report/take action can result in disciplinary action up to and including being fired/career ruined. The demand for "accountability" seriously reduces officer discretion. I'm very thankful that I served in a small town where we were usually the only officer on a scene and that I retired >20 yrs ago so never had to deal with the level of accountability that todays officers deal with.BTW, I wonder how many new gun owners will start to view the popo as the enemy based on gun bigotry behavior?
Still trying to figure out under why they felt they needed to confiscate the guns but found it perfectly acceptable to have a licensed relative take possession of the ammunition.
Doesn’t that require an FFL? Or is that only for a permanent transfer?Nonsense. If they were “gun-friendly” and/or knew the law they would have had the licensed relative take possession of the guns in addition to the ammo.
Doesn’t that require an FFL? Or is that only for a permanent transfer?
Doesn’t that require an FFL? Or is that only for a permanent transfer?