Again, I get what youre saying in regards to specific duty to any specific individual etc.Do police have a specific duty to any specific individual or not, absent a special relationship existing? Absent said duty (which doesn't exist per SCOTUS or DC Court of Appeals) it logically follows there can't be liability. Also please cite where a municipality shelled out $ for lack of carrying out a wellness check. Being sued is not equivalent to actually being liable.
I dont have a cite where a municipality shelled out $, because its irrelevant. Whether there are cases or there arent, it doesnt make a difference.
Why? Because of reality. Real world, everyday stuff. If the boss thinks he/she can be sued for not carrying out a H&W check, his perception becomes our reality. Youre told to make entry by your shift commander, you make entry. How you then conduct yourself once inside falls on the individual.
Unfortunately, it still all falls under the umbrella of liability, even though it shouldnt.