If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

I agree with you on this.

It wouldn't surprise me if she's approached the legislature and received assurance that they will get a bill thru that does what she was trying to do.

Yup and she'll "get right on it" at the same time she releases her list of AG Regs compliant guns (read the CMR, it states clearly that the AG will create and maintain a list of guns that meet her regs) . . . no AG has done this and no AG will do it either!

As reference, the US Army Corps of Engineers lost the case about banning possession on all Corps property. They told the judge that they would be revising the CFR. It is now 3-4 years later and there has been no such revision to the CFR. This case should not have been abandoned until she generated the memo and the lawyers and judge agreed to the wording.

She hasn't and she won't nor will her successor. They know that in criminal court their charade would get tossed, so they operate on FUD with no intention of prosecuting anyone.

<blockquote data-quote="Len-2A Training" data-source="post: 6522792" data-attributes="member: 13">I agree with you on this.It wouldn&#039;t surprise me if she&#039;s approached the legislature and received assurance that they will get a bill thru that does what she was trying to do.Yup and she&#039;ll &quot;get right on it&quot; at the same time she releases her list of AG Regs compliant guns (read the CMR, it states clearly that the AG will create and maintain a list of guns that meet her regs) . . . no AG has done this and no AG will do it either!As reference, the US Army Corps of Engineers lost the case about banning possession on all Corps property. They told the judge that they would be revising the CFR. It is now 3-4 years later and there has been no such revision to the CFR.&nbsp; This case should not have been abandoned until she generated the memo and the lawyers and judge agreed to the wording.She hasn&#039;t and she won&#039;t nor will her successor. They know that in criminal court their charade would get tossed, so they operate on FUD with no intention of prosecuting anyone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Len-2A Training, post: 6522792, member: 13"] I agree with you on this. It wouldn't surprise me if she's approached the legislature and received assurance that they will get a bill thru that does what she was trying to do. Yup and she'll "get right on it" at the same time she releases her list of AG Regs compliant guns (read the CMR, it states clearly that the AG will create and maintain a list of guns that meet her regs) . . . no AG has done this and no AG will do it either! As reference, the US Army Corps of Engineers lost the case about banning possession on all Corps property. They told the judge that they would be revising the CFR. It is now 3-4 years later and there has been no such revision to the CFR. This case should not have been abandoned until she generated the memo and the lawyers and judge agreed to the wording. She hasn't and she won't nor will her successor. They know that in criminal court their charade would get tossed, so they operate on FUD with no intention of prosecuting anyone. [/QUOTE]

Verification