Examining both sides of debate over arming teachers with guns

I find it’s not a debate. Those opposed to the option to arming staff/teachers are so emotionally overwrought that they cannot engage in productively. The last discussion I was in, the other person said “How many children have to die before you people will give up your guns?” They weren’t looking for a number…
 
I find it’s not a debate. Those opposed to the option to arming staff/teachers are so emotionally overwrought that they cannot engage in productively. The last discussion I was in, the other person said “How many children have to die before you people will give up your guns?” They weren’t looking for a number…

I've had this exact question posed to me. My answer was one. But they had to have been killed by one of my guns.
 
My favorite response talking to a friend about this. I said "The easy solution is to just have all the teachers armed." His shocked response "But I don't trust the teachers with a gun, what if they go crazy and shoot my son!". So.. the issue isn't the guns. It's that you send your kid to a building designed like a prison, with no guards, run by adults you don't trust to protect them, let alone don't trust them not to blow your kids brains out. I was homeschooled, screw your 100 million dollar indoctrination buildings and faculty full of bags of waste.
 
Obviously the teachers are too emotional to carry a firearm safely. Begs the question if they're even fit to teach. Maybe we should let the kids carry then? The bad kids already do, so let the good kids defend themselves.


Luckily, we homeschool so we don't need to worry about teachers.
 
Back
Top Bottom