• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Experts warn of increased risk of US terror attacks by rightwing ‘lone wolf’ actors

Reptile

NES Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
27,982
Likes
20,254
Feedback: 123 / 0 / 0
Individuals rather than organized groups more likely to commit extremist crimes as inflammatory Republican rhetoric escalates

The US is at an increased risk of domestic terror attacks by rightwing “lone wolf” actors, experts have warned, as inflammatory Republican rhetoric around a variety of issues seems likely to continue ahead of the 2024 election.

The number of attacks by adherents to rightwing ideology has soared since 2016, as Republican lies about election interference, and escalating rhetoric from the right about minority groups, have served to “provide mechanisms” for individuals to become radicalized, an analyst said.

As the threat of domestic rightwing terrorism rises, researchers say individuals, rather than organized groups, are now far more likely to commit what analysts call “crimes inspired by extremist ideology”.

There have been a series of such attacks in recent years. In May 2022 a white supremacist killed 10 Black people at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York. The attacker said he had chosen the location because it was in a predominantly Black neighborhood. He was sentenced to life in prison earlier this year.

A self-described white nationalist killed 23 people and injured 22 in a shooting in El Paso, on the border of Mexico and the US, in 2019, in an anti-immigration attack targeting Hispanic people.

In recent years a white supremacist killed nine people at a Black church in Charleston, South Carolina, while just this week a man was arrested after he crashed a rented truck into bollards near the White House. The man subsequently praised Adolf Hitler to investigators and said he intended to “kill the president”, according to charging documents.

Michael Jensen, senior researcher at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (Start) at the University of Maryland, said 70% of individuals committing terrorist acts in the US are individuals, or part of “isolated cliques” – small groups of three to four people.

“That said, these individuals might be lone actors, but they’re not lonely actors,” Jensen said.

“They are embedded in these online ecosystems where they are exchanging ideas with each other all day every day.”

Jensen leads the Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States (Pirus) project, a database tracking how US extremists came to be radicalized.


According to the data, 90% of the cases of US terrorists are classed as domestic. Of the domestic extremists, 95% are far-right, Jensen said: white supremacists, Proud Boys, anti-immigrant groups and anti-government groups.

There has been a worrying increase in the number of attacks. Prior to 2016, Jensen and his team logged about 150 individuals a year who were “committing crimes inspired by extremist ideology”.

Since 2016, the number of people committing such crimes has jumped to about 300-350 cases a year, Jensen said – not including a huge spike in 2021 as a result of the January 6 insurrection.

As the number of incidents have risen, there have been changes in how people come to rightwing terrorism.

“Before the internet and before social media, how an individual was likely to radicalize is that it was going to be through a face-to-face relationship that they had in the physical world,” Jensen said.

“So they had a cousin that was involved in a skinhead gang and they recruited them, or there was a group active in their neighborhood and they saw a flyer and took an interest in it.

“It was a much more labor-intensive process to get people involved.”


Continues...
 
I see the DNC is still using foreign media to create a narrative based on their fake dossiers and the FBI’s false flag bullshit.

Referenced in the article: the Indian kid with the Nazi flag who crashed into the WH barrier with a U-Haul, Patriot Front, non-RINO Republicans, and indirectly, Tucker Carlson.

Yawn.
 

There is a decided effort to conflate Conservative political typology with right-wind extremism by observing the rise in violent events since Trump/2015. Even if the rhetoric espoused by the so-called Flag & Faith Conservative platform correlates to more right-wing extremist events, does government/media have some moral authority to shut down speech? Or. More importantly, do they have a right/duty to shut down speech? A resounding NO.

If rioting, looting and burning is the “legitimate voice of the repressed” left, why is right-wing extremist violence “illegitimate”? In choosing to condone the former, the Progressive Left Democrats opened the door for extremist violence on both extremes. Government/media attempting to shut that door on only one political extreme undermines Democracy more than the violent events themselves, by an order of magnitude.

IMG_2209.jpeg IMG_2208.jpeg
 
So many outright lies from our leftist DimocRAT
but thanks to those lies - they can now send anyone for prison on any fake charge, as long as 'terrorism' is mentioned, or, if that is not possible - a 'seditious conspiracy' will do. for, like, 18 years.
are you conspiring something? no? you sure? be aware, it may be found seditious.

and - just to be sure people actually do know what it means:

se·di·tious
inciting or causing people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.
"the letter was declared seditious"

18 f#cking years. in the USA. for a 'conspiracy'.
 
Demonizing anybody who disagrees with these communists is part of the plan. Once they disarm us, it's power for life. The D pres for life will be like Idi Amin, and we'll be unwashed peasants serving our elite masters like AOC, Schiff, etc.
 
Well just look on the interwebs. Tons of pics of right wing terrorists from the last couple years...

32357886-8660507-image-a-254_1598353978690.jpg


30minneapolis-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg


1685446477598.jpeg

https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F200531031339-02-george-floyd-protests-0530-st-paul.jpg


5ed5379d2618b918297f7753


Yeah, better do something about those lone wolf right wingers.

:mad:
 
They define a right wing extremist as anyone who didn’t vote for Brandon. I consider myself a real right wing extremist. Doesn’t mean I am a violent person though.
To want to stop illegal immigration and to want to stop the hoards of third world layabouts from displacing the America as we know it ? Sure I'm on board in spades.
 
How about instead of looking at the potential for right wing extremism, they do something about the real life day to day mayhem committed by the left, in cities all across America.

Eliminate the actual left-wing crime, and the right won't have anything to potentially be extreme about.
 
How about instead of looking at the potential for right wing extremism, they do something about the real life day to day mayhem committed by the left, in cities all across America.

Eliminate the actual left-wing crime, and the right won't have anything to potentially be extreme about.

There is no left wing crime or terrorism.
You may have seen evidence to the contrary.
You may even think you have data that contradicts this.
Is it really worth losing your job over, or being sued?

There is no left wing crime.
 
There is no left wing crime or terrorism.
You may have seen evidence to the contrary.
You may even think you have data that contradicts this.
Is it really worth losing your job over, or being sued?

There is no left wing crime.

Ahh, yes. All the gang banging thugs in Chicago, St. Louis, New Orleans, Oakland, etc are all card-carrying MAGA Trump voters. My bad
 
Individuals rather than organized groups more likely to commit extremist crimes as inflammatory Republican rhetoric escalates

The US is at an increased risk of domestic terror attacks by rightwing “lone wolf” actors, experts have warned, as inflammatory Republican rhetoric around a variety of issues seems likely to continue ahead of the 2024 election.

The number of attacks by adherents to rightwing ideology has soared since 2016, as Republican lies about election interference, and escalating rhetoric from the right about minority groups, have served to “provide mechanisms” for individuals to become radicalized, an analyst said.

As the threat of domestic rightwing terrorism rises, researchers say individuals, rather than organized groups, are now far more likely to commit what analysts call “crimes inspired by extremist ideology”.

There have been a series of such attacks in recent years. In May 2022 a white supremacist killed 10 Black people at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York. The attacker said he had chosen the location because it was in a predominantly Black neighborhood. He was sentenced to life in prison earlier this year.

A self-described white nationalist killed 23 people and injured 22 in a shooting in El Paso, on the border of Mexico and the US, in 2019, in an anti-immigration attack targeting Hispanic people.

In recent years a white supremacist killed nine people at a Black church in Charleston, South Carolina, while just this week a man was arrested after he crashed a rented truck into bollards near the White House. The man subsequently praised Adolf Hitler to investigators and said he intended to “kill the president”, according to charging documents.

Michael Jensen, senior researcher at the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (Start) at the University of Maryland, said 70% of individuals committing terrorist acts in the US are individuals, or part of “isolated cliques” – small groups of three to four people.

“That said, these individuals might be lone actors, but they’re not lonely actors,” Jensen said.

“They are embedded in these online ecosystems where they are exchanging ideas with each other all day every day.”

Jensen leads the Profiles of Individual Radicalization in the United States (Pirus) project, a database tracking how US extremists came to be radicalized.


According to the data, 90% of the cases of US terrorists are classed as domestic. Of the domestic extremists, 95% are far-right, Jensen said: white supremacists, Proud Boys, anti-immigrant groups and anti-government groups.

There has been a worrying increase in the number of attacks. Prior to 2016, Jensen and his team logged about 150 individuals a year who were “committing crimes inspired by extremist ideology”.

Since 2016, the number of people committing such crimes has jumped to about 300-350 cases a year, Jensen said – not including a huge spike in 2021 as a result of the January 6 insurrection.

As the number of incidents have risen, there have been changes in how people come to rightwing terrorism.

“Before the internet and before social media, how an individual was likely to radicalize is that it was going to be through a face-to-face relationship that they had in the physical world,” Jensen said.

“So they had a cousin that was involved in a skinhead gang and they recruited them, or there was a group active in their neighborhood and they saw a flyer and took an interest in it.

“It was a much more labor-intensive process to get people involved.”


Continues...
I figured this garbage came from SPLC, aka leftist hysterics
 
Back
Top Bottom