Feinstein Bill

Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
20
Likes
3
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Has that bastion of hypocrisy, Senator Feinstein, filed her legislation yet? Today is supposed to be the day I believe. I cannot wait to see the fallacies included in it.
 
He meant CANCER, he hopes the B'ch get cancer.

smitty

I'd settle for this too.

heart-attacks_0.jpg
 
After recently losing my best friend (other than my wife) to cancer, I said I would never wish that on anyone, even my worst enemy...that being said, spontaneous combustion would be sweet.
 
This crap?...


Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms;
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics; and
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test;
Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test; and
Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans.
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment;
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes; and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons.
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration.

Nothing on THOMAS (Library of Congress) yet.

It's a red herring anyways... a ploy to "negotiate" "compromise" on an AWB that's not nearly as restrictive or over the top.

It might pass the Senate, and even if by some chance it does, it won't be easy.

Getting it by the House will be even more difficult, if not highly unlikely.
 
After New Yorkers' call of mass noncompliance and Clinton's warning, it'll be interesting to see if she is suppressed within her own party. Did I say suppressed? There will go her "first amendment right", or so I hope.
 
Back
Top Bottom