Palladin
NES Member
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
What law(s) did he break? Jack.
Realistically, none. In the government's reality: constructive possession.
If he didn't have firearms in his possession they are just paperweights as far as I can tell. Is this actually illegal?What law(s) did he break? Jack.
How the hell does the post office know what's in a package? Even if they were to xray them how would they identify what these are?
I'm confused... unless someone tipped the USPS off and they were looking for these things.
The funny thing is them switches are to make a air soft glock full auto as is.
You can't just take one of them and put it on the back of a glock it won't fit.
One of these with a shoulder stock on a polymer frame and one of those oil can suppressors and a drum mag would be awesome.
How many felonies is that?
Possibly none. See post 12. Jack.One of these with a shoulder stock on a polymer frame and one of those oil can suppressors and a drum mag would be awesome.
How many felonies is that?
The correct answer should be NONE.What law(s) did he break? Jack.
A package of full auto switchs he had 2 of them it must have been a vwry small bag if there was only 2 of them.
Here is 10 of them next to my IPhone 6
80.1% because anything above 80%, it becomes a "firearm."USPS misses a lot of things but when they do they will press the panic button. Those are 80% switches that need some work to fit. Certainly ATF considers dias, lightening links, switches as machine guns but since they are 80% where in ATF addendums do they consider that switch a machine gun?
The USPS has been scanning packages for eons now it seems. Doesn’t matter if it’s your grandmother’s rhubarb pie or a part for something.
My question is better stated as an Xray is one thing. But how is the USPS being able to correctly identify this and tens of millions of other parts and products and know what is illegal? These items are often in a box with lots of other metal stuff and could be xrayed at many different angles/perspectives. I'm not sure if there's enough computing power at the NSA to correctly identify every part/product that is shipped through the USPS via Xray.
So how/why did they catch this item?
Nothing constructive about it, those are by themselves machine guns in the eyes of the ATF. He's gonna get the .gov beef dagger.
My question is better stated as an Xray is one thing. But how is the USPS being able to correctly identify this and tens of millions of other parts and products and know what is illegal? These items are often in a box with lots of other metal stuff and could be xrayed at many different angles/perspectives. I'm not sure if there's enough computing power at the NSA to correctly identify every part/product that is shipped through the USPS via Xray.
So how/why did they catch this item?
Who wants to bet that Devante does not get charged to the fullest extent of the law?
Privilege.
Has it changed? it used to be you needed a receiver, a sear or something alone was never usually enough to say "constructive machinegun".