No idea, I wish I was 25 again!any idea if they still pull the "under 25 years old gets a restricted LTC" nonsense? They told me that when I first applied for my first LTC, and I said "well, good thing I turned 25 last week"
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Taurus G3C Optics Ready***
No idea, I wish I was 25 again!any idea if they still pull the "under 25 years old gets a restricted LTC" nonsense? They told me that when I first applied for my first LTC, and I said "well, good thing I turned 25 last week"
Took over 4 months for me. I called, left a polite message and got called back 2 days later to come pick up the new one in Townsend. Not sure if they forgot about me or what.6 months... jesus christ
"We'll Try"
at least its not restricted and you have the receipt for bypass.
they really do "try". Man what motto to work under. A former licensing officer of FPD now owns the Shooting Supply in Westport.6 months... jesus christ
"We'll Try"
at least its not restricted and you have the receipt for bypass.
Please tell me what the F town is before I comment.they really do "try". Man what motto to work under. A former licensing officer of FPD now owns the Shooting Supply in Westport.
Meh, just pick more colors. Puce, mauve, taupe, and ecru.We really need to update the rating scale, calling a town green when they fail to meet the time limit and add extra requirements kind of makes them look "good" when they are still infringing on our rights. How about:
Red - , only issues restricted or not at all, extra requirements to apply and/or fails to meet deadline.
Red , only issues restricted or not at all.
Yellow - , will issue without restrictions but not consistently, additional requirements to apply and/or fails to meet deadline.
Yellow , will issue without restrictions but not consistently.
Green - , issues without restrictions always, additional requirements and/or fails to meet deadline.
Green , issues without restrictions, no additional requirements but fails to meet deadline.
Green + , issues without restrictions always, meets deadline
Or maybe a letter grading system. Someone with more time on their hands could create a spreadsheet and % grading system. Kind of like school.Meh, just pick more colors. Puce, mauve, taupe, and ecru.
Ackchyually, one could do that systematically:Or maybe a letter grading system. Someone with more time on their hands could create a spreadsheet and % grading system. Kind of like school.
You've seen the Comm2A score cards, yes?Ackchyually, one could do that systematically:
Before clumping into colors you get a (sparse) version of this:
- Construct a list of attributes, and make them table columns.
- Attributes are always "positive" - phrased so "yes" or a bigger number is "better".
- Sort the columns so left to right is from most important to least important.
- Breaking ties between criteria is where subjectivity comes in.
- Fill in a table row for each town.
- Sort the rows so more valued towns precede lesser valued ones.
- Squint at the rows and see if they clump into similar groups; the groups become colors or grades.
![]()
I actually think I have a few cached,You've seen the Comm2A score cards, yes?
We really need to update the rating scale, calling a town green when they fail to meet the time limit and add extra requirements kind of makes them look "good" when they are still infringing on our rights. How about:
Red - , only issues restricted or not at all, extra requirements to apply and/or fails to meet deadline.
Red , only issues restricted or not at all.
Yellow - , will issue without restrictions but not consistently, additional requirements to apply and/or fails to meet deadline.
Yellow , will issue without restrictions but not consistently.
Green - , issues without restrictions always, additional requirements and/or fails to meet deadline.
Green , issues without restrictions, no additional requirements but fails to meet deadline.
Green + , issues without restrictions always, meets deadline
Town/Category | Restrictions | Meets deadline | Additional requirements | MG cards |
Boston |
|
|
|
|
Medford |
|
|
|
|
Even then, you'll want a column for restrict forever vs removes (after a year, on renewal)I agree in principle of having a more detailed system. I think the base red/yellow/green was always intended solely to convey red always restricted/yellow sometimes restricted/green never restricted. Though that is IMO more important than the others for people new to the intersection of MA and guns. Like Woburn and Medford are both redder than the devil's dick as far as restrictions but Woburn takes it a step further with the quiz or whatever they give you. Or like, different criteria would be difficult to agree on, like towns that are green with restrictions but that won't issue MG cards.
IMO assign each town a table of these, so red/yellow/green but for each category. Something like:
Town/Category Restrictions Meets deadline Additional requirements MG cards Boston
Medford