Whutmeworry
NES Member
But they still have to have either all X or some combination of X & Y chromosomes.Hermaphrodites have mixed genitalia.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
But they still have to have either all X or some combination of X & Y chromosomes.Hermaphrodites have mixed genitalia.
Just curious as to what the NES reaction would be if a bunch of LGBT people who were passionate about gun rights wanted to join NES and the fight against Healey and other infringers? Would the response be get lost Tinkerbell? Or is there space for others to join the fight? In my mind I don't care what the next person does, I just don't. If they are all for gun rights then they are good in my book.
True, but there has never been a confirmed case where both types of gonadal tissue have functioned on the same person, which can hint that there is a dominant trait in the person. Intersex is found in approximately 0.018% of the population, although it largely misconstrued to include more groups and exaggerated to boost numbers to the commonly distributed 1.7%. But even if 1.7% is true, it seems hard to justify setting a new standard of classifying human beings based on these statistics. As stated several times, abnormalities are not the norm.Hermaphrodites have mixed genitalia.
Just curious as to what the NES reaction would be if a bunch of LGBT people who were passionate about gun rights wanted to join NES and the fight against Healey and other infringers? Would the response be get lost Tinkerbell? Or is there space for others to join the fight? In my mind I don't care what the next person does, I just don't. If they are all for gun rights then they are good in my book.
True, but there has never been a confirmed case where both types of gonadal tissue have functioned on the same person, which can hint that there is a dominant trait in the person. Intersex is found in approximately 0.018% of the population, although it largely misconstrued to include more groups and exaggerated to boost numbers to the commonly distributed 1.7%. But even if 1.7% is true, it seems hard to justify setting a new standard of classifying human beings based on these statistics. As stated several times, abnormalities are not the norm.
I was in CA and there was a construction site wth 7 portapots. I asked why 7 and they said State Job - LGBTQIA. Huh I said, they’re all guys. Yup, they said.
They can take a hike to never never land. Those types are always insurgents that will redirect everything they touch towards social justice goals- power for themselves over normal sane people. In all the clamoring for more LGBTetc rights when have they ever included other populations? Never. If they were interested in gun rights they would use the power of normal gun owner numbers to get exclusive gun rights for marginalized populations. The LGBTetc crowd can live freely in their populations of higher than heterosexual peoples levels of crime, drug use, disease, depression, domestic abuse and suicide. They hate us and use our tolerance as a club against us I will not fall for it.Just curious as to what the NES reaction would be if a bunch of LGBT people who were passionate about gun rights wanted to join NES and the fight against Healey and other infringers? Would the response be get lost Tinkerbell? Or is there space for others to join the fight? In my mind I don't care what the next person does, I just don't. If they are all for gun rights then they are good in my book.
But with the portapots the trick has always been to find the least nasty, which is almost always the least used. This tends to be a function of human mobility, queuing theory, etc.that's what festivals are like. it's the 50's anniversary of Woodstock 69. people really do need a break.
This...
That "social decay" stuff is the same mindset that pushed/pushes for gun control too...
and also stuff like
"we hafta ban the drugs that stuff is POYSON!!!!!!! CHILLLLLDREN!"
(and of course, that worked out swimmingly)
"We cant have faggots prancing around in public! what about the chillldren? seeing that? "
not much different from
"Who do they think they are, carrying around guns in public like that? What if children see the guns???" etc same brand of bullshit etc.
"bray bray bray wah wah wah"
These are the same people that set up HOAs because they're pissed that their neighbor parks his A-team replica van on the street and
they think it's ugly, etc, ad nauseam.
-Mike
You may if that is the color the attack based on and if your standing next to himWe really just need to be attacked by aliens so we can stop worrying about dumb things. When the mother ships come, do you care if some dude wears pink?
They can take a hike to never never land. Those types are always insurgents that will redirect everything they touch towards social justice goals- power for themselves over normal sane people. In all the clamoring for more LGBTetc rights when have they ever included other populations? Never. If they were interested in gun rights they would use the power of normal gun owner numbers to get exclusive gun rights for marginalized populations. The LGBTetc crowd can live freely in their populations of higher than heterosexual peoples levels of crime, drug use, disease, depression, domestic abuse and suicide. They hate us and use our tolerance as a club against us I will not fall for it.
They can take a hike to never never land. Those types are always insurgents that will redirect everything they touch towards social justice goals- power for themselves over normal sane people. In all the clamoring for more LGBTetc rights when have they ever included other populations? Never. If they were interested in gun rights they would use the power of normal gun owner numbers to get exclusive gun rights for marginalized populations. The LGBTetc crowd can live freely in their populations of higher than heterosexual peoples levels of crime, drug use, disease, depression, domestic abuse and suicide. They hate us and use our tolerance as a club against us I will not fall for it.
Correct!Most people couldn't care less if you have a penis and wear a dress, or if you have a vagina and want to act like a man. The problem is that the cosmopolitan progressives want to FORCE everyone else into agreeing with their point of view, which is designed from the get go to isolate and incite certain parts of the population so they are at each other's throats. One of the well documented strategies of the progressive movement. They can't win unless they break the population down into smaller isolated groups so they can continue their 5th column takeover of the world through bureaucracy, education (re-education), control of the media, and control of popular culture. Transgender, gay, etc. are just smaller groups they can use to drive their agenda. For instance, progressives all support the Salafist Islamic Fundamentalists who also want to enslave the entire world because they help divide, confuse, and quite frankly kill a lot of the proles they someday want to be Royalty for. They support that kind of genocidal behavior because it distracts everyone from them. So they support the wholesale murder of gay people on one hand by supporting Islamic Terrorists, while on the other side they tell LGBTQUOOJFEOOAS people that they are so concerned about them and they should rise up and force everyone to learn that He and She are no longer valid pronouns even though they describe the vast majority of people. You see what they are doing? Progressives are the most significant threat to freedom that the world has ever faced, in the end, they want to be the new world dominating royalty class while we are all slaves, which is why they just love Communism/Socialism. Don't let them be successful, they have a 100 year head start, but they are very good at distraction, and don't care at all about your freedom or your life. Only their own personal power.
To possibly protect some infinitesimal number of people that truly believe they were born with the wrong hardware we should tolerate the perverted trannies seeking to destroy Western civilization? No thanks. And for all the 'gay people are normal people with one thing different' crowd you don't know them that well. Same as the race lies the truth is out there go look at CDC stats for behavior in the gay community. They are not the same with one single different desire. Gays are not your allies and will vote to send you to gay re-education camp if given half a chance. All politics are tribal and they ain't of your tribe.Yeah but you are only looking at the liberal SJW types. They are the loudmouth idiots that do more damage to their cause then help it. Instead I would imagine that there are a vast majority of people living very quiet lives, they don't show up and dance in pride parades like fools, they just want to live normal lives. Some of them are gun toters. Why isolate them? I bet they have more in common with the conservative/libertarian side than you can imagine. If you isolate people all it does is drives them straight into the arms of the idiotic SJW/NPCs.
I just ran into this pronoun bullshit for the first time in my professional career. I had someone from BU law reach out about a placement program for their students and this person had it right in their email signature, above the name of their organization:
[name]
[title]
Pronouns: she/her/hers
Boston University School of Law
[department]
765 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215
[phone]
Makes me not want to bring that crap into my organization.
People normally make their own email signatures. At my law school, I think one or two people have the preferred pronoun email signature and they work in the Public Interest law department, in contrast to the career development people I work with who do not (presumably to avoid offending employers, e.g. you). It was more common at my undergrad. You're going to see it more and more because educational institutions cater to the young and liberal.
All I can say is judge the candidate by their merits and not by a line on an email signature. I've worked with the two public interest people before and let's just say I'm very right wing. I didn't infect any offices with liberalism. If anything, I spread a little conservative and or libertarian love.
People normally make their own email signatures.
I have a couple personal email accounts and I set the sigs in them based upon what I use them for. I have an email account that's issued by the organization that I work for, and they have a standard for the signature. In fact they send out templates describing exactly how the signature will look because the emails that come from that account represent that organization...
People normally make their own email signatures.
I have a couple personal email accounts and I set the sigs in them based upon what I use them for. I have an email account that's issued by the organization that I work for, and they have a standard for the signature. In fact they send out templates describing exactly how the signature will look because the emails that come from that account represent that organization...
I have worked at places like that before. Other orgs, like law schools, give more discretion to faculty/staff. The faculty secretary at my law school has a rather appropriate quote as her email sig: "Character is how you treat those who can do nothing for you", which I interpret to mean "be extra nice to secretaries because they have the power."
Even if you're given a template, you still make it yourself. You just use the mandated template.
Even if you're given a template, you still make it yourself. You just use the mandated template
Say that with a straight face.
I did. Its the individual employee's email signature and its their name on the line. The employee can be fired or disciplined, companies are harder to hold accountable (from the point of view of one customer or one employee or one email recipient).
Your point isn't very clear - is it that employers should require all employees to have the same email signatures, or is it that we should hold employers accountable for employee email signatures? Either proposition is going to result in more widespread use of the preferred pronoun signature line because HR and corporate counsel (assuming the company is big enough to have both) is always going to err on the side of more deference to what isn't going to get them sued.
If you have a penis you are a man, if you have a vagina you're a woman. Those are medical/physical facts.
I don't care what you THINK you are, you are what you are. If you have a penis you're a MAN, if not you're a women. If you are confused on this you need to see a mental health pro. I might think I'm the Queen of England but I'm NOT.
True, but there has never been a confirmed case where both types of gonadal tissue have functioned on the same person, which can hint that there is a dominant trait in the person. Intersex is found in approximately 0.018% of the population, although it largely misconstrued to include more groups and exaggerated to boost numbers to the commonly distributed 1.7%. But even if 1.7% is true, it seems hard to justify setting a new standard of classifying human beings based on these statistics. As stated several times, abnormalities are not the norm.