MaverickNH
NES Member
There’s a mixed bag of comments in this WSJ article- some discussing design features /implementation and others whining about guns, as expected. But far less anti-gun than WaPo, NYT, etc.
”These design ideas are creating an unsettling siege mentality with ill-defined enemies at the gate. Is that helping or cranking up our problem with societal violence? Couldn’t these new designs be perceived as new challenges to be met by would- be shooters?”
”It is a sign of a deformed society when there is more action reforming class room design rather reforming laws to curb the slaughter of school children. You will see a lot of readers gas light about mental illness and family values. However, the facts and data have shown other countries with similar rates of mental illness have drastically lower mass shootings and gun violence deaths. I wonder why?”
”Just think about how insane this all is in terms of our society. When I was in grade school in the 50s and 60s, we did "duck and cover" drills out of fear of Russian nukes, but no one ever gave the slightest thought to the possibility of people with guns walking into schools and killing people. Now our focus is on fortifying our schools to stop the shooters. People walking around with guns who want to invade schools and kill kids is the norm. That's how far we've fallen as a country.”[/i}
”Only in a sick, deranged society that for some bizarre , inexplicable reason is more in love with guns than the lives of students, is it necessary to turn schools into armed fortresses. No other country has this problem, yet we think we are the greatest of all in all respects.”