I suspect that anybody that goes against someone like you will win.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
In general, what kind of gun law do we want?
- Thread starter IvIax
- Start date
- Status
I suspect that anybody that goes against someone like you will win.
It started off full retard.
Well this has been another fine "Out Yourself" thread.
These guns should be banned...
... 'cause I've seen a few shops in my time.
These guns should be banned...
... 'cause I've seen a few shops in my time.
In a good way, in a good way.
EC I regret that I had but one rep to give. Out of the park those last two posts.
Well this has been another fine "Out Yourself" thread.
These guns should be banned...
... 'cause I've seen a few shops in my time.
I know this guy. He goes to my gym. He's always curling in the squat rack.
Let me explain my "coward" comment.
You said this:
OK. Let's negotiate.
You're a gun owner willing to negotiate and I want to take your guns.
What are you going to give up? You personally don't think you'll give up anything because you're not a felon, and you're certainly not mentally ill. So let's make it so that felons and people that I decide are mentally ill can't have guns.
So the negotiation involves you giving away someone else's rights. Fair enough.
A negotiation implies that you give something up and get something in return.
You gave up some poor bastard's rights. What did you get in return?
More safety and security? No, not really. You already agreed that laws won't stop a truly dangerous person from committing mayhem.
You gave up rights for the illusion of security.
That's being a coward. If it's not, please tell me where I missed.
You said this:
OK. Let's negotiate.
You're a gun owner willing to negotiate and I want to take your guns.
What are you going to give up? You personally don't think you'll give up anything because you're not a felon, and you're certainly not mentally ill. So let's make it so that felons and people that I decide are mentally ill can't have guns.
So the negotiation involves you giving away someone else's rights. Fair enough.
A negotiation implies that you give something up and get something in return.
You gave up some poor bastard's rights. What did you get in return?
More safety and security? No, not really. You already agreed that laws won't stop a truly dangerous person from committing mayhem.
You gave up rights for the illusion of security.
That's being a coward. If it's not, please tell me where I missed.
Last edited:
GlockJock
NES Member
For starters, maybe Arizona's....yet even THAT has its' restrictions (thanks to the Feds), and there should not be any restrictions, period. Lock up criminals, lock up murderers, keep them there (or lethl-inject them), and LEAVE ME THE F*CK ALONE SINCE I AM A LAW-ABIDING, LEGAL CITIZEN.
Period.
Now how much further would you like to take this useless thread? (Is there a moderator in the house??)
Attachments
You mean besides the three that have posted in this thread in the last ten minutes?
ETA: We need to let these "out yourself" threads runs for a while every so often.
It helps sort out the freedom haters among us.
Last edited:
M60
NES Member
I'll bet that you'll find that IvIax came from a place where gun ownership is completely out of the question and is looking for quality feedback to his question because he can without government reprisal.
MisterHappy
NES Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,407
- Likes
- 17,592
I DO NOT NEGOTIATE MY RIGHTS FOR ANYTHING !!!!!!!!
![[popcorn]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/043.gif "Popcorn [popcorn]")
How about a gun law that makes you apply to a local agency, then they send it to another agency,and they send it to another agency. Then it makes it back to the first place you applied and someone you never met decides if you can get a gun permit or not.
Oh $hit we have that already.![[laugh]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/012.gif "Laugh [laugh]")
Oh $hit we have that already.
Last edited:
Glockster30
NES Member
What law ever does?
Poor trigger discipline!
ChevyGuy91
NES Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 22,923
- Likes
- 23,513
This, all day. It is a good reminder that some gun owners are willing to roll over and sell the rest of us out.
![[pot]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/037.gif "Stir the pot [pot]")
Serious Answer One : Thou Shalt not commit Murder. Really , that's all the gun control and weapons law we need.
FU & still serious answer Two :
I'll compromise.
Scrap every gun law , sit down with a pen and paper , and write me up a set that applies to All private citizens who aren't locked up and over the age of ... 4 foot 10 inches ... AND ALL local/county/State & federal LEO ( including National Guard) alike. This must include things in past use as well - like M-14s ...
If the National Guard or ATFE can't have have it , I'll give it up , too. ...
FU & still serious answer Two :
I'll compromise.
Scrap every gun law , sit down with a pen and paper , and write me up a set that applies to All private citizens who aren't locked up and over the age of ... 4 foot 10 inches ... AND ALL local/county/State & federal LEO ( including National Guard) alike. This must include things in past use as well - like M-14s ...
If the National Guard or ATFE can't have have it , I'll give it up , too. ...
A good law won't stop ANY truly dangerous person. If a ****ing law can stop them, how dangerous are they really?
headednorth
NES Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 26,669
- Likes
- 49,203
Thats an excellent point
- Status
