First of all I would like to say.. Great thread OP. I relish caliber discussions on these boards, even when they end up being "caliber wars." Simply outstanding - thank you. I really enjoy the insight of shooters with much more skill and experience than I have,
I also want to point out that I STILL love .40. Yeah, 185 grain is a little snappy, but 165 grain really isn't and if you ever get a chance, try to get your hands on some 135 grain. It's out there. And when ammo dries up .40 is usually still available
Everyone used to point out that .40 was supported by American law enforcement from Feds, to State, to local.
True, but think about 38 special. Couldn't you say the same? How many of us still shoot a ton of 38 special in our favorite 357 revolver?
6.5 Creedmore is awesome, but I don't think 308 is going anywhere. First of all, it is very effective at ranges far greater than most shooters can shoot. There are also millions of rifles chambered in 308.
Yes, the 6.5 is a little more accurate in competition and recoil is a little less, but 308 is still really manageable and crazy accurate. I think the biggest plus with the Creedmore is how much better it copes with wind.
If I was shooting competitions, would I want the 6.5? Hell yes. For shots that I would actually take, I don't know if the additional cost is worth it. I really doubt I would take a 600 yard shot at game with either round, and unless you head out west for mulies or something you are not likely to get that shot. If I did, I would want 300 win mag or 338 Lapua.
If I made my living with a rifle, or lives were on the line, sure I would want the 6.5. Am I going to buy a new Remington 700 and mothball my old one in 308? Nope.