paulleve
NES Member
I hit the range today to try a variety of cheap ammo through a 15-22 and CMMG conversion kit mounted in a 14.5" barreled AR. I forget the twist rate on the AR, so let's say it's 1/8.
Both rifles have red dots. The AR has a Sig Romeo5 mounted, and the 15-22 has a factory M&P red/green dot.
Groups were all 5 shots fired from 25 yards. The Romeo5 definitely had the advantage when shooting at the 3/4" dots. At the low setting I was somewhat able to see the orange dots. The M&P was a different story. The green dot was at least 2x the size of the targets, so some educated guessing was involved!
The CMMG target is on the left and 15-22 on the right. Each corresponding dot was shot with the same ammo. In general, the 15-22 groups were mostly about 1/2 the size of the CMMG. Both liked CCI Standard Velocity, and both didn't do so well with Mini Mags. Most of the 15-22 groups measure about 1". I'm sure both would do better with a little more patience, and some one of these weekends I may scope them both for a more accurate comparison.
Overall I have been impressed with the reliability of both setups. There was only one FTE today out of 200-300 rounds, and that was from the CMMG with a Mini Mag. That's the only failure this has had in about 400 rounds.
Here are my takes on both both setups:
CMMG
Good: Cost effective at about $135 shipped with a single magazine. Reliable, and just drops in. Can use this on the AR you already own with whatever upgrades you may have.
Bad: Not as accurate. Bolt release does not work with .22 mag. Your AR will get .22 LR dirty!
15-22
Good: Very reliable. I've put thousands of rounds of the cheapest ammo through it without any issues. Light, good for newbies. Controls all function like the real thing.
Bad: Not as easy to accessorize. More expensive at $400-500 depending on model.
Both rifles have red dots. The AR has a Sig Romeo5 mounted, and the 15-22 has a factory M&P red/green dot.
Groups were all 5 shots fired from 25 yards. The Romeo5 definitely had the advantage when shooting at the 3/4" dots. At the low setting I was somewhat able to see the orange dots. The M&P was a different story. The green dot was at least 2x the size of the targets, so some educated guessing was involved!
The CMMG target is on the left and 15-22 on the right. Each corresponding dot was shot with the same ammo. In general, the 15-22 groups were mostly about 1/2 the size of the CMMG. Both liked CCI Standard Velocity, and both didn't do so well with Mini Mags. Most of the 15-22 groups measure about 1". I'm sure both would do better with a little more patience, and some one of these weekends I may scope them both for a more accurate comparison.
Overall I have been impressed with the reliability of both setups. There was only one FTE today out of 200-300 rounds, and that was from the CMMG with a Mini Mag. That's the only failure this has had in about 400 rounds.
Here are my takes on both both setups:
CMMG
Good: Cost effective at about $135 shipped with a single magazine. Reliable, and just drops in. Can use this on the AR you already own with whatever upgrades you may have.
Bad: Not as accurate. Bolt release does not work with .22 mag. Your AR will get .22 LR dirty!
15-22
Good: Very reliable. I've put thousands of rounds of the cheapest ammo through it without any issues. Light, good for newbies. Controls all function like the real thing.
Bad: Not as easy to accessorize. More expensive at $400-500 depending on model.
Last edited: