Reply to thread

You missed my point entirely when there are people who have felony indictments and there are open warrants / they will f***ing take everything/  (and when i mean they, i mean whoever is serving the process)  wherever it lies they do not care whether a gun is legal or not.     I'm not talking about this from a "mass trying to get people's guns point of view" I'm talking about it from a happenstance kind of a thing.        

To be perfectly clear all of this 2016 bullshit I believe is Much Ado About Nothing.     My point was that states can still "act orbitally" in the cases of someone being accused of other crimes.        In this case the person is usually going to have much bigger things to deal with than losing their guns anyways so most of it is like tilting at windmills or something.      I was just trying to make the point that states will gladly go on to other people's tyranny by extending warrants when it involves things like DV ROs,   murder,  rape, diddling or theft.

With regards to mass being able to prosecute somebody over this that has their gun stored somewhere else? Of course you are correct- of course it's f***ing impossible.        That requires some extraordinary legal gymnastics to believe that it is.    I remember a New Hampshire judge speaking on this kind of issue and some dumb f***ing prosecutor was trying to make a point that a guy had this gun that was illegal in Rhode Island to the state that he had come from....  the judge literally said to the prosecutor "well, we're not in Rhode Island.  "   the guy probably shut the f*** up about the gun after that.