Reply to thread

I dont think that would hold up to the standards set by Bruen. If the court ever strikes down mag bans, it has said in the past magazines are equal in their eyes as firearms regarding their constitutional protection. Given that would be a carry based law, the court has been much more receptive to those cases than feature based bans.


Only parts of 2nd Amendment that the court hasn't been favorable to is reducing the current definitions of a Prohibited Person. That's why anyone who dates as a gun owner is playing with fire.


Back
Top Bottom