If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

I apologize. I was confusing the Highland Park case with the Naperville Interlocutory appeal.

Highland Park was denied Cert in 2015, which was pre Bruen and a very different Court.

I predicted that Bruen would do for “Bearing” what Heller did for “Keeping”, and I was right about that.

and I think/hope Snopes will do the same for “Arms”.

It’s like SCOTUS is ruling on the Second Amendment one word at a time.

If I end up being wrong going forward, I will readily admit it.

[QUOTE="Cap'n Mike, post: 9345612, member: 57638"] I apologize. I was confusing the Highland Park case with the Naperville Interlocutory appeal. Highland Park was denied Cert in 2015, which was pre Bruen and a very different Court. I predicted that Bruen would do for “Bearing” what Heller did for “Keeping”, and I was right about that. and I think/hope Snopes will do the same for “Arms”. It’s like SCOTUS is ruling on the Second Amendment one word at a time. If I end up being wrong going forward, I will readily admit it. [/QUOTE]

Verification