If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Forums
General
General Discussion
Maryland AWB case Snope v Brown waiting on Cert grant from SCOTUS. (Formerly Bianchi v Brown & Bianchi v Frosh)

Reply to thread

Message

Interesting that the 11th cited heller, Bruen, and rahimi as declaring 922 presumptively lawful on its face. Im assuming by denying cert, scotus agrees? I didn't read the entire opinion so I'm unfamiliar with the defendants exact circumstances, but wondering if they challenged 'as applied' they would've had a chance

[QUOTE="aphextwin11, post: 9426582, member: 84926"] Interesting that the 11th cited heller, Bruen, and rahimi as declaring 922 presumptively lawful on its face. Im assuming by denying cert, scotus agrees? I didn't read the entire opinion so I'm unfamiliar with the defendants exact circumstances, but wondering if they challenged 'as applied' they would've had a chance [/QUOTE]

Verification

Forums
General
General Discussion
Maryland AWB case Snope v Brown waiting on Cert grant from SCOTUS. (Formerly Bianchi v Brown & Bianchi v Frosh)