If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

If mags over 10 can be banned, then what's stopping states from banning mags that hold more than 5? It's simply a number generated out of nothing and these courts in the future if a state does a total ban on all detachable mags (think SKS or Mauser Broomahandle as all that's legal for semi autos at that point) the courts will uphold them.

The Left is willing to slowly cut the pie down to nothing with 2A, for now the slice they want is mags over 10 rds and the next step we're seeing from states like Colorado is complete bans on semi autos or at least a process to purchase them so time consuming and costly people won't bother, what I will call a Process Ban where the actual firearm is not banned, but the process to obtain them is such a hurdle that most will not attempt to go thru it or in some cases those of low income won't have the ability to pay for it.

The Left cries deceptively about how expensive and tough it is for some people to get an ID to vote, but those same people they want to put thru the ringer to buy a Hi Point.

<blockquote data-quote="T-Unit" data-source="post: 9442599" data-attributes="member: 64269">If mags over 10 can be banned, then what&#039;s stopping states from banning mags that hold more than 5? It&#039;s simply a number generated out of nothing and these courts in the future if a state does a total ban on all detachable mags (think SKS or Mauser Broomahandle as all that&#039;s legal for semi autos at that point) the courts will uphold them.The Left is willing to slowly cut the pie down to nothing with 2A, for now the slice they want is mags over 10 rds and the next step we&#039;re seeing from states like Colorado is complete bans on semi autos or at least a process to purchase them so time consuming and costly people won&#039;t bother, what I will call a Process Ban where the actual firearm is not banned, but the process to obtain them is such a hurdle that most will not attempt to go thru it or in some cases those of low income won&#039;t have the ability to pay for it.The Left cries deceptively about how expensive and tough it is for some people to get an ID to vote, but those same people they want to put thru the ringer to buy a Hi Point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="T-Unit, post: 9442599, member: 64269"] If mags over 10 can be banned, then what's stopping states from banning mags that hold more than 5? It's simply a number generated out of nothing and these courts in the future if a state does a total ban on all detachable mags (think SKS or Mauser Broomahandle as all that's legal for semi autos at that point) the courts will uphold them. The Left is willing to slowly cut the pie down to nothing with 2A, for now the slice they want is mags over 10 rds and the next step we're seeing from states like Colorado is complete bans on semi autos or at least a process to purchase them so time consuming and costly people won't bother, what I will call a Process Ban where the actual firearm is not banned, but the process to obtain them is such a hurdle that most will not attempt to go thru it or in some cases those of low income won't have the ability to pay for it. The Left cries deceptively about how expensive and tough it is for some people to get an ID to vote, but those same people they want to put thru the ringer to buy a Hi Point. [/QUOTE]

Verification