There is another mag ban case, still interlocutory, out of DC that is petitioned to SCOTUS.
Hanson v. District of Columbia
Question presented in the petition:
Whether the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution allows a categorical ban on arms that are indisputably common throughout the United States and overwhelming used for lawful purposes(generally) and self-defense (specifically).
William Kirk from Washington Gun Law discusses it. Skip the first approx 3 minutes of the video though.
[MEDIA=youtube]gvfKaUJEbB4[/MEDIA]
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvfKaUJEbB4
"In a new challenge to Washington DC's magazine ban, today we discuss the matter of Hanson v. DC in which 26 Attorneys General have now weighed in via an amicus brief. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses their memorandum and how they are demanding that SCOTUS just do its job. The complete mutiny of the lower courts is alive and well and the highest court in the land does not appear motivated to stop it. So learn more today and arm yourself with education. "
26 states file Amicus Brief asking SCOTUS to get off their ass and do their job.
https://ago.wv.gov/Documents/Hanson Amicus Brief.pdf
"Since Bruen, courts have purported to use text, history, and tradition to determine whether firearm law restrictions are consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. In practice, however, lower courts have continued to use whatever means necessary to uphold laws that have prevented most citizens in those jurisdictions from exercising the right to bear arms. Until this Court steps in, this will continue happening."
