Mass AWB’s days are numbered

[Mass Firearms]

View: https://youtu.be/3FZyzcoWLJ8

 

[Drix]

Thumbs up based on title.

Down with this bullshit and the roster.

 

[SgtHal75]

Been enjoying this guy’s content for a few months now… him and the four boxes diner guy

 

[BREWINZ]

The madness needs to stop. No more bans. Standard capacity magazines and full-auto for all.

 

[SlaveZero]

Four boxes guy is borderline incoherent.

 

[Blackbeard83]

F'n Romney... f*** him....

I really hope the AWB in Mass gets destroyed in court at some point but I doubt it will be anytime soon.

 

[pastera]

Four boxes guy is borderline incoherent.

He's very geeky with the minutiae
Impossible to get a quick sitrep but good if you are reading the opinions on your own and want some backup

 

[1903Collector]

Romney was governor in 2016? Did I hear that right? Where the f*** was I?

 

[SFC13557]

Not holding my breath even thou it's pretty much a joke..

 

[PappyM3]

Romney was governor in 2016? Did I hear that right? Where the f*** was I?

….

The MA AWB was signed into law in 1998z

 

[pastera]

….

The MA AWB was signed into law in 1998z

But it was made permanent by Romney

 

[Toast]

Romney was governor in 2016? Did I hear that right? Where the f*** was I?

Indeed. He's off by quite a bit.

But it was made permanent by Romney

That may be, but he was out of office in 2007. Baker was governor in 2016.

You wonder how much better the last few years would have been had Baker's spine not collapsed like overcooked linguine in the face of an upper respiratory virus. Once he got the ball rolling, other states felt they had free rein to join in.

 

[SgtHal75]

Romney was governor in 2016? Did I hear that right? Where the f*** was I?

Yeah, he got his dates and Romney mixed up in that video. Doesn’t matter, you could get rid of every gun law in MA today and I’m still leaving this miserable f***ing state.

 

[pastera]

Indeed. He's off by quite a bit.


That may be, but he was out of office in 2007. Baker was governor in 2016.

You wonder how much better the last few years would have been had Baker's spine not collapsed like overcooked linguine in the face of an upper respiratory virus. Once he got the ball rolling, other states felt they had free rein to join in.

The Mass AWB was going to be renewed with or without Romney so he could have vetoed it stating that fact.
And Baker never had a spine to collapse

 

[EddieZoom]

I appreciate this guys confidence and his reasoning make sense....but most of us Ma**h***s are pretty sure if there is a way for the powers to be to f@ck us, they will find it regardless of Heller, Bruen or whatever else u want to throw at them.

Hope I'm wrong.

 

[VetteGirlMA]

When this case first came up in court I wrote those guys at NAGR a nice big check and thanked them for stepping up. Let's at least put these a*holes on the record. I am chomping at the bit to read the MA defense on this law because I am going to splatter their nonsense defense all over twitter. The left is going to have to really argue and any nonsense will be exposed. I personally guarantee it. No more free passes for the anti civil rights left.

 

[Tartakovsky]

Your lips to God’s ears

 

[FalArAk]

What was the position of GOAL with that legislation, where they against it?

 

[Dennis in MA]

It looks like the NAGR's just hate Romney - they spent their press release just slamming him and the MA laws are secondary to that. LOL

 

[EddieZoom]

What was the position of GOAL with that legislation, where they against it?

I think there was a quote that seemed a little pessimistic...not sure if there is an official stance.

Struck me as a little odd that this group I've never heard of is fighting on our behaf.

 

[M60]

Wake me up when mauras crap is gone

 

[BJones]

Just looked out of the window for flying pigs ... also the lady singing on the radio isn't fat.

 

[DJBrad]

I’ve been checkin every evening but the cows haven’t come home yet nor the chickens to their roost

 

[rosco61]

Same day Hilary gets to pay her debt to society. This fantasy will come true as well.

 

[Joeldiaz]

Just FYI, GOAL doesn’t support NAGR. GOAL doesn’t believe in being a “no compromise” organization as they believe it does more harm than good here in MA. They also don’t agree with filing a lawsuit against the AWB so soon after Bruen because they think that there’s plenty of AWB cases across the country, one of them is bound to hit SCOTUS sooner or later. No need to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees for no reason.

 

[btnh6668]

Lol

 

[Beretta92FS]

Just FYI, GOAL doesn’t support NAGR. GOAL doesn’t believe in being a “no compromise” organization as they believe it does more harm than good here in MA. They also don’t agree with filing a lawsuit against the AWB so soon after Bruen because they think that there’s plenty of AWB cases across the country, one of them is bound to hit SCOTUS sooner or later. No need to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees for no reason.

So what does GOAL believe in then? Sitting on their asses, waiting for the world to change?

 

[P51MA]

Just FYI, GOAL doesn’t support NAGR. GOAL doesn’t believe in being a “no compromise” organization as they believe it does more harm than good here in MA. They also don’t agree with filing a lawsuit against the AWB so soon after Bruen because they think that there’s plenty of AWB cases across the country, one of them is bound to hit SCOTUS sooner or later. No need to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees for no reason.

It's ideal to have multiple cases going. If we win somewhere else, that leaves two possibilities: 1) We also win here. 2)
We lose here, putting 2 federal circuits in disagreement, which, by custom, forces SCOTUS to take the case.

The goal should be to get this to SCOTUS ASAP before someone tries to stack the court or, I mean, Clarence Thomas is getting a bit old...

 

[Toast]

Just FYI, GOAL doesn’t support NAGR. GOAL doesn’t believe in being a “no compromise” organization as they believe it does more harm than good here in MA. They also don’t agree with filing a lawsuit against the AWB so soon after Bruen because they think that there’s plenty of AWB cases across the country, one of them is bound to hit SCOTUS sooner or later. No need to spend thousands of dollars on legal fees for no reason.

GOAL has often struck me as far too willing to accept being on the wrong side of "What's mine is mine, what's yours is negotiable", typically by bleating how much worse things could have been.

 

[Joeldiaz]

So what does GOAL believe in then? Sitting on their asses, waiting for the world to change?

What’s interesting to me is that GOAL puts out this post after Bruen talking about how they’re not gonna challenge the MA AWB because they don’t want to waste money, but then here they go and donate $10,000 to help fund the legal challenges of Boland v. Bonta & Antonyuk v. Nigrelli, two cases that won’t even affect MA at all unless they get to SCOTUS. Seems like they should be sending that money to Comm2A instead to help fight the inevitable Bruen response bill that we all know the legislature is currently working on. We need to get the same injunctions NJ & NY had.