Massachusetts Bill HD.4420 "An act to modernize gun Laws"

Broc said:
Mine said:

"Do you like d*ck? ... if you vote for HD4420 it means you do."
Click to expand...
I like this letter. It covers all the things that one is told to include when writing to politicians.

It is short.

It is concise.

It does not allow any opportunity for the reader to misunderstand the writer's opinion on 4420.

Even if an aide has to read this letter to the politician....a not unusal situation these days.... both individuals will completely comprehend the writer's point of view.

Overall, a very well-done example of how we should communicate with the Boston Beautiful People.
 
so... I originally emailed Paul "fat f***" Feeney back in July about this.. and got this response:

Dear XXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your concerns related to HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.
This bill has been filed in the House of Representatives by Representative Michael Day and has been assigned to the Joint Committee on the Judiciary. Each bill must receive a public hearing before it can be released from Committee or be subject to debate in the House of Representatives or the State Senate.
I am not currently a cosponsor of the bill. As the bill makes its way through this public process, it can be amended or changed, which could result in an entirely different bill being debated than what is currently before the Committee. As this legislative process unfolds, my staff and I are reviewing the current version of this legislation to gather a full understanding of the bill and are actively engaged in discussions with Senate colleagues. I welcome you to continue to make your voice heard as this bill makes its way through the legislative process, including by submitting written testimony to the Committee Chairs who are reviewing the bill.
As I review the bill, it would be helpful for me to hear your specific concerns around the language in the bill. Which specific section or sections of the proposed legislation may impact you directly? I always appreciate hearing from constituents on matters that they are passionate about and I rely heavily on the thoughts, opinions, ideas, lived experiences, and stories of those that live in our district to inform my actions in the Senate. I will be sure to consider the second amendment rights and the thoughts of lawful gun owners as I review this legislation, and I expect the Committee Chairs to do the same as they review the bill.
Thank you again for reaching out, and please feel welcome to reach out to me going forward if I can be of assistance to you.
Yours in service,
Paul
Senator Paul R. Feeney
Massachusetts - Bristol & Norfolk District
Chair - Joint Committee on Financial Services
Click to expand...

Then today, in a response to another email telling him about the MACOP position, he replies:
Dear XXXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your support for HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.
Throughout my time in the Senate, I have been, and remain, supportive of measures that will make our communities, schools, and neighborhoods safer by reducing gun violence. Particularly in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision, I believe that Massachusetts should act to shore up any loopholes in our gun laws that are putting citizens at risk f further violence. For that reason, an Orange "Everytown for Gun Safety" sign hangs at the entrance of my office, and I have been an active participant in meetings and discussions with advocates, constituents, and at events hosted by Everytown and Moms Demand Action throughout my Senate district. I look forward to monitoring closely the Public Hearing process on this bill and would encourage you to make your voice heard by registering testimony with the Committee as well.
I always appreciate hearing from constituents on matters that they are passionate about and I rely heavily on the thoughts, opinions, ideas, lived experiences, and stories of those that live in our district to inform my actions in the Senate. Please do not hesitate to reach out to me in the future at any time and for anything at all.
Yours in service,
Paul
Senator Paul R. Feeney
Massachusetts - Bristol & Norfolk District
Chair - Joint Committee on Financial Services
Click to expand...

so.. Maybe I'm making a bigger deal of this than it is, but it looks like he has 2 form letter responses.. one for anti-4420 and one for pro-4420. Now maybe it's me, but I'm much rather him have one f***ing letter saying exactly how he feels, and what his position is, than put out 2 letters, one of which is obviously BULLSHIT.

so my position is that this fat f*** is a fraud and liar.. NO SURPRISE THOUGH, Democrat politician... I told his office that point blank.. and I plan on telling him in person when I see him at the NA Block party in Sept.
 
EMTDAD said:
so... I originally emailed Paul "fat f***" Feeney back in July about this.. and got this response:



Then today, in a response to another email telling him about the MACOP position, he replies:


so.. Maybe I'm making a bigger deal of this than it is, but it looks like he has 2 form letter responses.. one for anti-4420 and one for pro-4420. Now maybe it's me, but I'm much rather him have one f***ing letter saying exactly how he feels, and what his position is, than put out 2 letters, one of which is obviously BULLSHIT.

so my position is that this fat f*** is a fraud and liar.. NO SURPRISE THOUGH, Democrat politician... I told his office that point blank.. and I plan on telling him in person when I see him at the NA Block party in Sept.
Click to expand...
Neither one sounds anti-4420 to me. One seems non-committal, and the following up one seems to be him making his anti-gun/pro-4420 position known since you won’t leave him alone about it. He’s basically telling you that you’re not going to convince him to vote against it so stop trying.
 
Joeldiaz said:
Neither one sounds anti-4420 to me. One seems non-committal, and the following up one seems to be him making his anti-gun/pro-4420 position known since you won’t leave him alone about it. He’s basically telling you that you’re not going to convince him to vote against it so stop trying.
Click to expand...
the non-committal one is to shut up anti-4420 folks like me. It definitely wasn't anti-4420. I should've said "one for anti-4420 constituents and one for pro-4420 constituents


Dear XXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your concerns related to HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.

Dear XXXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your support for HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.

I NEVER EVER alluded to support of 4420. IMHO, these are not successive letters, but 2 different canned form letters.

so I then send him this:
wow... different canned response than the one I got last month. I guess you can't be honest with your constituents on where you stand on any proposed legislation.

You send me one email telling me you're willing to look at it's final form (since you know I oppose it) then you send the next saying you support it (incorrectly assuming I do as well).

Typical fraud politician. I will do everything I can to assure you do not get re-elected.
Click to expand...

and immediately get a response from his CoS. literally 12 minutes later... that's light speed in government time..

Hi XXXX,

Thanks for your note. I’m sorry you feel that way. We’re doing our best to respond to as many constituent inquires we get as we receive them, as you can imagine, we are receiving a great many, both in favor of the proposed legislation, and against. The Senator remains committed to reviewing the bill in it’s final form, and while he has been active in discussions with stakeholders in favor, he has stated to me that he thinks this particular bill goes to far. As the email states, we still need to follow closely the public hearing on this and future action, and appreciate hearing from constituents during that process.

Nevertheless, I’d be happy to set some time for you to connect directly with the Senator to clear things up. We have a long way to go before this bill can become a law, and appreciate your involvement as that process unfold. Our office and Senator Feeney values that.
Sincerely,

Keith

Keith Drucker
Chief of Staff
Click to expand...

IMHO, this guy is all-in on this and he'll vote YES on any piece of shit bill that crosses his desk.
 
EMTDAD said:
the non-committal one is to shut up anti-4420 folks like me. It definitely wasn't anti-4420. I should've said "one for anti-4420 constituents and one for pro-4420 constituents


Dear XXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your concerns related to HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.

Dear XXXXXX,
Thank you for reaching out to my office with your support for HD.4420, “An Act modernizing gun laws in the Commonwealth”.

I NEVER EVER alluded to support of 4420. IMHO, these are not successive letters, but 2 different canned form letters.

so I then send him this:


and immediately get a response from his CoS. literally 12 minutes later... that's light speed in government time..



IMHO, this guy is all-in on this and he'll vote YES on any piece of shit bill that crosses his desk.
Click to expand...
Goes "to" far? How about some spell check and grammar check? More wasted taxpayer dollars.
 
Harry Christopher said:
Even if an aide has to read this letter to the politician....a not unusal situation these days....
Click to expand...
Unless the letter has a big fat check included, the aides only tally the yeas and nays and report the totals.

Unless you're in NH, where there are no aides and no big fat checks.
 
Woodsloafer said:
I would love to get it on the ballot at the next (possible) state election to make the legislature part-time (like NH) and then have it pass. Cut them right off from their money train, save a shitload of money, and lessen (hopefully) the number of laws they can pass.

Click to expand...

Shit, August 2 was the deadline to initiate the process of getting it on the ballot, only required 10 "signers", I would have been game to work on this and organize people to get the required signatures by November 22. We could get it done with just LTC holders signing the main petition.

1691549424344.png
 
Quite a few pages back there was an offering of signs to post that say ‘Stop 4420’ - I saw two of these today in braintree alone

Who is printing these out, can someone let me know?
 
pdm said:
Once again proving that ACB is a bitchass.
Click to expand...
Folks don’t take this the wrong way, but nominating women to high positions is foolish.

Regardless of conservative “slant” or training or upbringing, they are the weaker sex.

They are easily swayed by emotional arguments and the “fear du jour” published by deceptive media.

In ancient times it also meant you were basically screwed.

God judged Jerusalem by setting this up:

Isa. 3:12: Youths oppress my people, women rule over them.
 
KBCraig said:
Unless the letter has a big fat check included, the aides only tally the yeas and nays and report the totals.

Unless you're in NH, where there are no aides and no big fat checks.
Click to expand...
During times like these I certainly wish that we were in New Hampshire.....but that is not to be.......heavy sigh......
 
safetyfirst2125 said:
Folks don’t take this the wrong way, but nominating women to high positions is foolish.

Regardless of conservative “slant” or training or upbringing, they are the weaker sex.

They are easily swayed by emotional arguments and the “fear du jour” published by deceptive media.

In ancient times it also meant you were basically screwed.

God judged Jerusalem by setting this up:

Isa. 3:12: Youths oppress my people, women rule over them.
Click to expand...
I don’t think this has anything to do with being a woman. Justice Kavanaugh has also sided with the liberals more times than I’d like, and quite frankly I’m surprised he didn’t side with them this time. Chief Justice Roberts has always been wishy washy, so you can never count on his vote.
 
Joeldiaz said:
I don’t think this has anything to do with being a woman. Justice Kavanaugh has also sided with the liberals more times than I’d like, and quite frankly I’m surprised he didn’t side with them this time. Chief Justice Roberts has always been wishy washy, so you can never count on his vote.
Click to expand...
Thats because Roberts is still part of Epsteins Island blackmail. That is why they have never released the client list from Ghislane, they are still using it as leverage. If they let it out, no more leverage.
 
SteelShooter said:
Thats because Roberts is still part of Epsteins Island blackmail. That is why they have never released the client list from Ghislane, they are still using it as leverage. If they let it out, no more leverage.
Click to expand...
Exactly.

ACB’s not on the Epstein list so she needs persuading a different way: fear mongering, deceptive press to create the perception her opinions are clearly the minority, etc. exploit her weakness.

She has no “Shut up and GFY” in her firmness of beliefs, like a few of the men conservative justices.

It’s working.
 
safetyfirst2125 said:
Folks don’t take this the wrong way, but nominating women to high positions is foolish.

Regardless of conservative “slant” or training or upbringing, they are the weaker sex.

They are easily swayed by emotional arguments and the “fear du jour” published by deceptive media.

In ancient times it also meant you were basically screwed.

God judged Jerusalem by setting this up:

Isa. 3:12: Youths oppress my people, women rule over them.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree. Women are just generally more emotional, by God's design. That is why they - in general - make better caregivers. This doesn't mean they aren't also great leaders. It just means that men (again, by design) tend to be more objective and less emotional.

Our current society totally lacks any sense of objectivity at all. Thus there is no objective view of right and wrong. Thus there are no consequences for anything anyone does anymore. This has happened before many times throughout human history, and is Biblical.
 
Whutmeworry said:
I don't disagree. Women are just generally more emotional, by God's design. That is why they - in general - make better caregivers. This doesn't mean they aren't also great leaders. It just means that men (again, by design) tend to be more objective and less emotional.

Our current society totally lacks any sense of objectivity at all. Thus there is no objective view of right and wrong. Thus there are no consequences for anything anyone does anymore. This has happened before many times throughout human history, and is Biblical.
Click to expand...
There are consequences if you don't align with their view of things, we see that time and time again.
 
EMTDAD said:
so... I originally emailed Paul "fat f***" Feeney back in July about this.. and got this response:



Then today, in a response to another email telling him about the MACOP position, he replies:


so.. Maybe I'm making a bigger deal of this than it is, but it looks like he has 2 form letter responses.. one for anti-4420 and one for pro-4420. Now maybe it's me, but I'm much rather him have one f***ing letter saying exactly how he feels, and what his position is, than put out 2 letters, one of which is obviously BULLSHIT.

so my position is that this fat f*** is a fraud and liar.. NO SURPRISE THOUGH, Democrat politician... I told his office that point blank.. and I plan on telling him in person when I see him at the NA Block party in Sept.
Click to expand...

"lived experience" is a stock progressive by-line!
 
drgrant said:
I think its an intentional headfake, so they can slide in a one-liner bill that is devastating but that fudds wont blink twice
on because they don't know what an 80% receiver even is....
Click to expand...
Not so sure I agree with you on this one Mike. They know what a receiver is and they know k what 80% is. Not to hard to to figure out that a 80% receiver is only 80% complete. The term Fudd doesn't equal stupid.
 
M60 said:
Not so sure I agree with you on this one Mike. They know what a receiver is and they know k what 80% is. Not to hard to to figure out that a 80% receiver is only 80% complete. The term Fudd doesn't equal stupid.
Click to expand...

It's more than fudds. The average mass gun owner is a clueless retard. They don't know what a receiver is they've never built gun off of a receiver let alone an 80%. We're biased here, NES is not the LCD NPC mass gun owner.

The key difficulty will be maintaining the same level of pressure on "round 2". That will be more difficult when it's a harder sell to a layperson/npc.
 

Similar threads

Legislative push starts to repeal Massachusetts gun law
2
Replies
48
Views
2K
Chevy 2 65
Chevy 2 65
New and “improved” gun laws. Hahaha
2 3 4
Replies
116
Views
2K
Mark from ?
M
AG Bondi Proposes Stronger Gun Confiscation Laws
Replies
21
Views
735
1sern
1
Shush act
2
Replies
42
Views
860
Dennis in MA
Dennis in MA
Misdemeanor Assault and Battery Conviction Massachusetts 1994
Replies
22
Views
530
Rob Boudrie
Rob Boudrie
Back
Top Bottom