WARNING............THIS IS A LONG RESPONSE...... SO IF YOU GET BORED EASILY.......OR ARE PRESSED FOR TIME....... FEEL FREE TO IGNORE IT
I am certainly not more learned than you, but here are a few of the talking points I have been sending to our representative and senator.........without much in the way of a response from either one of them which, while disappointing, does not come as much of a surprise to me.
We are writing to you to respectfully request that during your consideration of any legislation to address gun control you bear these points of opinion in mind. While the original H.D. 4420 may be "dead" as one of your colleagues wrote to a constituent who contacted them to express their concerns regarding the said 4420 proposal, the original underlining intentions enumerated in the proposal still lurk in the background....... alive and well...... just waiting for another host to latch onto and bring them back to life.
It may be easy to cavalierly dismiss the opinions of your constituents who contact you expressing their reservations pursuant to what 4420 set forth as just the idle chatter of "gun nuts" who are parroting the party line of their pro-gun organizations, but have you also listened to and taken into account the published opinions from the following people:
The mayor and the police chief of the third largest city in the Commonwealth (Springfield) and the mayor of Westfield have expressed their collective opinions that the ideas behind 4420 will NOT address the issue of crime in any meaningful manner in their cities.
The legislation, HD.4420, called “An Act modernizing firearm laws” was filed June 26 by Rep. Michael Day, D-Stoneham.
www.masslive.com
The Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, a statewide organization, does not support the 4420 legislation as it was originally written.
The Ware MA police chief does not support 4420 as it was originally written.
The Ware Police Department would like to bring an important matter to your attention: the proposed anti-gun Bill currently under consideration (HD 4420, An Act Modernizing Firearms Laws). We understand that this state-level legislation has raised concerns among law-abiding citizens who value...
www.thetruthaboutguns.com
The Plymouth MA police chief does not support 4420 as written.
“As I enter my third year as your police chief, responsible for overseeing the 123 sworn men and women who serve the more than 60,000 of you day in and day out, my duty compels me to speak up. “I have read the relevant portions of H.D. 4420, a bill proposing a substantial rewrite of […]
fallriverreporter.com
The opinions referenced above are not just the idle random rantings of what the anti-gun crowd likes to call the great unwashed and uninformed, but rather the opinions of individuals who are actually confronting the issues of criminal behavior in their towns and cities on a daily basis and trying to do something about it for the benefit of improving the quality of life for all of their residents. It would be more than a stretch of imagination to claim that these folks are just the usual "gun nuts" whose opinions are not worth taking into consideration when you are considering legislation to address the issues of crime in the Commonwealth.
The last major legislation concerning itself with the issue of crime was the Acts of 1998 Chapter 180 bill that upon enactment was said to achieve the following:
“Today, Massachusetts leads the way in cracking down on gun violence,” said Republican Governor Paul Cellucci as he signed the bill into law. “It will save lives and help fight crime in our communities.” Scott Harshbarger, the state’s Democratic attorney general, agreed: “This vote is a victory for common sense and for the protection of our children and our neighborhoods.” One of the state’s leading anti-gun activists, John Rosenthal of Stop Handgun Violence, joined the applause. “The new gun law,” he predicted, “will certainly prevent future gun violence and countless grief.”
It didn’t.
One could be forgiven for thinking that the article this excerpt was taken from was just another foaming at the mouth pro-gun author .........but you would be completely wrong in that opinion. The article was written by Jeff Jacoby and printed in the Boston Globe....not a publication noted for supporting the Constitutional civil rights of gun owners with any degree of enthusiasm....on February 17, 2013 and entitled:
View attachment 786719
In 1998, Massachusetts passed what was hailed as the toughest gun-control legislation in the country. It was predicted that the law would prevent future gun violence. It didn’t.
www.bostonglobe.com
While the following analysis of the original 4420 proposal was in fact written by an organization (GOAL) which does support the law-abiding owners who have chosen to avail themselves of firearms as tools to protect their loved ones....their in-depth analysis of just what enactment of the ideas expressed in the original 4420 proposal who result in for all the residents of the Commonwealth are more than a little eye-opening and certainly more honest than have been the political pronouncements from the House leadership and authors of the bill to both their fellow colleagues and the public at large:
The above are the "facts" that I have been sowing upon the barren political ground here in the Back of Beyond......with frankly......not a notable amount of obvious success.....but if you find any of them to be of interest feel free to employ them while conversing with your own political Beautiful Person.