You've never heard of Dave Linsky before? Are you a new gun owner?I know nothing about him just happened to see his bill.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
You've never heard of Dave Linsky before? Are you a new gun owner?I know nothing about him just happened to see his bill.
Agree, but the Bloomberg money runs deep; and now that we all know who Mike Day is the bill has already had its desired effect.I think the best line of questioning would be to ask them specifically which crimes any of the laws they're proposing would have prevented. You can't try logic with them, you're not going to win the feelz battle with them, but if you can stump them when it comes to exactly which actual crimes that have occurred in MA would have been prevented by this law it might make them look foolish and expose them IF we can then get that message out.
Damn
Kinda I'm young and have only held an ltc for 3 yearsYou've never heard of Dave Linsky before? Are you a new gun owner?
It has to do with demographic density.you can post up areas with strong gun control like nyc, and you'll see daily stories of assaults with knives, and baseball bats, rocks, and fists. and still, guns. It
you can post up crime stats from vt, nh, and me with very little gun control equal to or better than ours in ma. still, it doesn't seem to make a dent.
at some point you'd think someone would sit up and notice, but i guess actually attempting to solve problems isn't the primary goal.
They did good research on who to pick to put it forward. Can’t have a radical minority, or a nut like Linsky with endless legal problems. You need to have a run of the mill, inoffensive, toe the line white guy who just also happens to be incredibly far left and who will do whatever they say with the promise that they’ll push to get him into a higher office someday. It should be interesting when the dem party decides they don’t want a run of the mill white guy in higher office. That‘s Ed Markey and he’s taking up space that a female minority will take when they’re done with him.Agree, but the Bloomberg money runs deep; and now that we all know who Mike Day is the bill has already had its desired effect.
Solving the problem would take work, and alot of people would not like it as they might not get funds from the government.It has to do do with demographic density.
Solving the problem would take work, and alot of people would not like it as they might not get funds from the government.you can post up areas with strong gun control like nyc, and you'll see daily stories of assaults with knives, and baseball bats, rocks, and fists. and still, guns.
you can post up crime stats from vt, nh, and me with very little gun control equal to or better than ours in ma. still, it doesn't seem to make a dent.
at some point you'd think someone would sit up and notice, but i guess actually attempting to solve problems isn't the primary goal.
Here's one reply from himMaybe someone can take the kid to the range & to a strip club after? Perhaps enlighten him on guns?
This release should be referenced in every letter to a rep going forward.Mass Chief of Police Association Response to HD.4420
A quote from the report:
An everyday common term used in the media and by both Government and Civilian officials is “GUN
VIOLENCE.” The “gun” is always blamed in any horrific act. We lose sight of the fact the “gun” is the tool
of the person who committed the violent crime.
https://www.goal.org/resources/Mass...TxPC_Su11ilWV0syAhC4TmCicTdxjUyDOeC5XUXvk9X20
I hope it passes with no off-duty police exemption. I can’t wait for the first time someone calls 911 because they see what turns out to be an off duty cop carrying, and then the cops show up and send him on his way as a courtesy while some Karen films it, and then the cops who let him go get suspended or fired. Make sure your union sends more money to the democrats.
When Linsky isn’t dodging state taxes or pushing to de-criminalize bestiality*, he likes to submit bills that are the most flagrant restrictions on gun owners year after year. Well, most flagrant restrictions until this one put forth by Day.Kinda I'm young and have only held an ltc for 3 years
Sounds like the police realize that the problem is not, and never has been, responsible, legal owners, but fing CRIMINALS.Mass Chief of Police Association Response to HD.4420
A quote from the report:
An everyday common term used in the media and by both Government and Civilian officials is “GUN
VIOLENCE.” The “gun” is always blamed in any horrific act. We lose sight of the fact the “gun” is the tool
of the person who committed the violent crime.
https://www.goal.org/resources/Mass...TxPC_Su11ilWV0syAhC4TmCicTdxjUyDOeC5XUXvk9X20
The dipsh*t should have learned that he was supposed to approach the gun control groups first for the cut and paste bills and the campaign money. They weren’t going to give him a dime, though with the tax evasion charges or that lunatic beasty nonsense.When Linsky isn’t dodging state taxes or pushing to de-criminalize bestiality*, he likes to submit bills that are the most flagrant restrictions on gun owners year after year. Well, most flagrant restrictions until this one put forth by Day.
* sadly, I’m serious about this
i could do a long one on this, but this is a gun forum so i'll save you all the pain.Solving the problem would take work, and alot of people would not like it as they might not get funds from the government.
The easy thing to do is shot on law abiding citizen, have the problem get worse, then shit on us again.
If an issue was solved, they wouldn't be needed.
Edit -replied to the wrong comment
I am probably right there with you, lol.i could do a long one on this, but this is a gun forum so i'll save you all the pain.
tldr: yup.
quick scan looks like they dumped all over it, the last conclusion page is pretty good.Interesting read from the mass cheif of police association kinda rejects the new prohibited carry areas among other things
Winchester is one of the bill’s sponsors towns, along with Stoneham.A database maintained by The Associated Press and USA Today in partnership with Northeastern University tracks this large-scale violence dating back to 2006
Here's the data for MA
View attachment 774425
Thank you for informing meWhen Linsky isn’t dodging state taxes or pushing to de-criminalize bestiality*, he likes to submit bills that are the most flagrant restrictions on gun owners year after year. Well, most flagrant restrictions until this one put forth by Day.
* sadly, I’m serious about this
A large part of the anti-gun rhetoric is stoked by how batshit #$%^&*ing crazy and evil many of the most vocal and visible advocates of 2A come across. Sorry, but this is true. Constant talk of overthrowing a tyrannical government, prepping for the boogaloo, dog-whistling Nazi-isms, religious extremist viewpoints. All of this scares the $%^& out of the middle and the left and gives them ammunition to sell the idea they must limit our basic rights. (In fact, some among the left have been driven to purchase firearms out of fear of those very pro 2A folks who spew that stuff. The whole dynamic is toxic and polarizing.)
The "pry it from my cold dead hand' firebrand rhetoric may galvanize the base but the base doesn't need more galvanizing and it undermines any mechanism of rational argument. If the Pro 2A folks can't learn to find more palatable spokespeople and make 'Hey, he's kind of like me and my family" arguments, this will not end well. Politics includes (is sometimes primarily) marketing. If we in MA want to successfully advocate against this bill, we must find a way to present ourselves as (and maybe try being) the "cooler heads".
(And, yep, I know I'll get flamed for this and, in that flaming, my point will be proven.)
I agree that racial and other diversity in the pro 2A voices (or with any political goal) is important. Pink Pistols, is a good example.
I think we can make an effort to choose by who we promote, who we loudly distance ourselves from and we can choose how we use our voices. I know my interactions with my electeds over this have been very civil and, from the evolving tone during the chats, at least effective in getting them to not assume everyone against this bill is nuts.
Do you have a link to this?A database maintained by The Associated Press and USA Today in partnership with Northeastern University tracks this large-scale violence dating back to 2006
Here's the data for MA
View attachment 774425
This should now be added to emails to reps we like to help them make their case, and, we should be reaching out, again, to those who said they support the bill to make sure they know clearly that not only do the Chiefs not support it, but we know the Chiefs don't support it. Sure wouldn't hurt if the press got some of this to them either.