If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
They'd say your neglect of personal hygiene demonstrates you are a threat to yourself and others and deny renewal.If I have to renew every three years, I want it to be an unpleasant experience for everyone. I’ll look and smell like a gremlin so they’ll want to burn everything I touch.
Slippery sneaky cocksuckersHouse passes gun bill as amendment to bond legislation
THE MASSACHUSETTS House on Thursday quickly introduced and passed provisions tightening gun licensing standards in response to a recent US Supreme Courtcommonwealthmagazine.org
And California has moved a bit more off spectrum with this:
Newsom signs gun law modeled after Texas abortion ban, setting up Supreme Court fight
The California governor signed a gun control bill Friday that mimics Texas' abortion ban. He also unveiled an ad targeting Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.news.yahoo.com
Can we see more full retard from these states? But didn’t we see this coming? I still stand by my original assessment that states will be increasingly divided until we see a SCOTUS under pressure to make changes.
Sounds like a little of everything to screw us over.Wonder what shit they’re cooking up for next session?
Pro tip, don’t read this shit before bed. It keeps you up at night. Stayed up late writing emails to my elected asshats.Sounds like a little of everything to screw us over.
Most definitely a grubby, unsuitable fudge packer, imagine how dirty his barrels must be!They'd say your neglect of personal hygiene demonstrates you are a threat to yourself and others and deny renewal.
Too late. I am already pissed to the Nth degree.Pro tip, don’t read this shit before bed. It keeps you up at night. Stayed up late writing emails to my elected asshats.
I don't think the bill actually says this. What's in the bill is a replacement of "may issue" with "shall, following a personal interview, issue". I don't read that as requiring that chiefs perform an interview for every renewal. Rather, I think this just preserves their authority to continue requiring interviews if they so choose, when previously this authority was inherent in "may issue".From GOAL:
3. Require in person interviews for licensure-including renewals.
It's all a big scramble over the recent Supreme Court hits.And California has moved a bit more off spectrum with this:
Newsom signs gun law modeled after Texas abortion ban, setting up Supreme Court fight
The California governor signed a gun control bill Friday that mimics Texas' abortion ban. He also unveiled an ad targeting Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.news.yahoo.com
Can we see more full retard from these states? But didn’t we see this coming? I still stand by my original assessment that states will be increasingly divided until we see a SCOTUS under pressure to make changes.
Abortions are never ever referenced in the language within the COTUS but I seem to remember something about "...shall not be infringed!" written down in there someplace.It's all a big scramble over the recent Supreme Court hits.
MA DPH is racing to protect MA medical (aka abortion) providers from legal consequences regarding out of state patients seeking services in MA.
Ironic. The complete opposite of our AG sending threats to out of State Ammo shippers selling to MA residents, although it is legal to do so.
so it will be like a gun show ?If I have to renew every three years, I want it to be an unpleasant experience for everyone. I’ll look and smell like a gremlin so they’ll want to burn everything I touch.
You mean like the current licensing deadlines that most never meet and nothing happens?I can not imagine the chiefs putting up with an unfunded mandate from the legislature to do something that if they fail to do puts them at risk of federal civil rights suits.
That was before SCOTUS declared 2A a fundamental right. Delaying a firearms license is now on the same level as a state delaying providing an ID in a timely fashion for someone to be able to vote in a state which requires voter ID.You mean like the current licensing deadlines that most never meet and nothing happens?
Thanks for this. It reminds me of the Sullivan Act that just got SCOTUS’s attention last month.1905 report advocating gun control in Mass.
Interesting bit was brought to my attention today found in the 1905 report of the State Police advocating for control of concealed weapons due to the vicious foreigners' customs.www.northeastshooters.com
Ah, well then. It seems that both of these laws targeted (southern) Italian immigrants, like my ancestors. I bet my great grandfather would have had a very difficult time getting the same LTC I have. And this is why I don’t have any heirloom firearms in the family. Because of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.The stiletto followed the first wave of Italian diasporato the city of New Orleans, Louisiana during the mid-19th century, where the knife became a popular weapon of gamblers, gang members, and assorted assassins.[22] The stiletto was involved in so many stabbings and murders in New Orleans that the city passed an ordinance in 1879 outlawing the sale or exhibition for sale of any stiletto within the city limits.[23] Italian immigrants to America frequently purchased or made such knives for self-defense,
IIRC ours and NYCs were contemporaneous, and both regions were seeing similar immigrant groups. It stands to reason that their motivations were closely coupledThanks for this. It reminds me of the Sullivan Act that just got SCOTUS’s attention last month.
I wonder whether they were both in response to the same immigrant groups? This old document doesn’t say explicitly, but it mentions laborers with stiletto knives.
Ah, well then. It seems that both of these laws targeted (southern) Italian immigrants, like my ancestors. I bet my great grandfather would have had a very difficult time getting the same LTC I have. And this is why I don’t have any heirloom firearms in the family. Because of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
**Second Amendment**:
MA House Sneaks Anti-Civil Rights Language into Unrelated Technology Bond Bill – Gun Owners Action League
Yesterday the Massachusetts House voted on a judicial technology bond bill that included some drastic changes to the Commonwealth’s gun licensing scheme. In a surprise move that surprised no one, with no warning the Democratic Leadership proposed the amendment, which had nothing to do with the bill, in the morning and by the afternoon rammed it through. Although Republican Leadership attempted to block the amendment, in the end it was included and the bill unfortunately passed with, disappointingly, some bipartisan support. You can find the roll call votes for both the amendment and the bill here:
Click Here for Roll Call H. 5046 Adoption of Amendment #13
Click Here for Roll Call Engrossment
Amendment adopted 120-33, final bill passed 146-7
This still has to go to the Senate for a vote.
Please contact your Representative IMMEDIATELY and let them know this is unacceptable and should not be passed. You can find your legislator's contact information here: Find My Legislator
Stay tuned later for a more in depth statement from GOAL further explaining what happened
I can't wait until someone files that suit and rams it straight up through the courts...
LOL. With the validity time cut in half, you're going to wait longer than ever for your licenses/renewals.That was before SCOTUS declared 2A a fundamental right. Delaying a firearms license is now on the same level as a state delaying providing an ID in a timely fashion for someone to be able to vote in a state which requires voter ID.
LOL. With the validity time cut in half, you're going to wait longer than ever for your licenses/renewals.
My "Hey i'm a gun owner too " Rep couldn't whip out the pen any faster to sign the red flag bill without tearing a muscle.If I see Brad at a town meeting, I won't be as polite but I won't be exceptionally belligerent either. Christopher, however, is not the guy who made the vote. For all I know he might, in his heart, agree with us. He could even be a gun owner, who knows. I am appealing to Christopher to make my point to Brad Jones.
Treating Christopher (or any of the staff people really) inconsiderately would be like me getting mad at you for some policy or rule your boss pulled out of his ass. No need.
Correct.Moving isn’t the answer. By all means do so if you want, but freedom is only an election away and the demographics of all 50 are now (or soon will be) changing in favor of the commies.
You are being replaced because you reproduce too slowly and because you vote the wrong way. True Americans are too difficult to rule. It’s much easier to bring in peasants who are already trained to obey.
Well he is... so there's thattired being polite.. if I see Scanlon, I'm gonna tell him he's a f***ing douche.
I don't think any department is tossing and turning in bed tonight over it.Probably more effective to call your local PD and tell them how excited you are to be handing them more paper and administration work to do, they love that kind of work. This affects them, not lawmakers
Tell us again, how many heads in CT have you caved in? Or are you equally unconcerned?Correct.
If these Ma**h***s were really at all concerned, by now some of these legislators' houses would have burned to the ground, and some of their skulls would have been smashed by a well-swung piece of rebar.
Which Thomas knowing full well would happen, mentioned it in the ruling is no bueno.I see the main purpose of the Amendment as circumventing Bruen via greater/more frequent license hassle and applicant intimidation via the new interrogation thang.
The double-the-cost money bonus is just icing on the cake.
View attachment 641043