If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

The silver lining here is that this case was decided based on a prior version of the statute, and the subsection that the chief in this case used to deny the LTC no longer exists, having been removed in 2022. The current statutory language appears to concern only the applicant's behavior--not that of third parties. The Appeals Court tried to hint that it still could have been denied under the current law, but had to admit that it would be a stretch to do so. The dissent is on point.

[QUOTE="AlphaWhiskeyPapa, post: 9458820, member: 94992"] The silver lining here is that this case was decided based on a prior version of the statute, and the subsection that the chief in this case used to deny the LTC no longer exists, having been removed in 2022. The current statutory language appears to concern only the applicant's behavior--not that of third parties. The Appeals Court tried to hint that it still could have been denied under the current law, but had to admit that it would be a stretch to do so. The dissent is on point. [/QUOTE]

Verification