Hi folks,
In conjunction with the Heller decision, I've purchased my very first 1911: a S&W Gunsite. I field stripped it last night and got it all ready for the range. I do have a question about function:
When the hammer is uncocked and I rack the slide, when the slide finishes slamming forward the hammer is left fully cocked. This is exactly what I would expect.
When I rack the slide with the hammer fully cocked, the slide travels forward and the hammer remains fully cocked.
When fully cocked with the slide stop engaged and manually racked without a mag, the hammer falls to half-cocked.
As I tested for function as described above, I had no mag in the magwell and the gun was unloaded.
Is this by design? If so, what is the purpose?
I'm also noticing that compared to my Glock 21, the slide is REALLY stiff. The Glock slide comes back real easy while it takes some English to pull the slide back on the 1911. Is this a question of breaking in the recoil spring, or are 1911's just stiffer by design?
In conjunction with the Heller decision, I've purchased my very first 1911: a S&W Gunsite. I field stripped it last night and got it all ready for the range. I do have a question about function:
When the hammer is uncocked and I rack the slide, when the slide finishes slamming forward the hammer is left fully cocked. This is exactly what I would expect.
When I rack the slide with the hammer fully cocked, the slide travels forward and the hammer remains fully cocked.
When fully cocked with the slide stop engaged and manually racked without a mag, the hammer falls to half-cocked.
As I tested for function as described above, I had no mag in the magwell and the gun was unloaded.
Is this by design? If so, what is the purpose?
I'm also noticing that compared to my Glock 21, the slide is REALLY stiff. The Glock slide comes back real easy while it takes some English to pull the slide back on the 1911. Is this a question of breaking in the recoil spring, or are 1911's just stiffer by design?
Last edited: