New and “improved” gun laws. Hahaha

bpd859

NES Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2025
Messages
46
Likes
39
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
By chance does anyone know what and if there are any exemptions on law enforcement owning, possessing or buying handguns not on the Mass approved list. (Such a farce)
 
By chance does anyone know what and if there are any exemptions on law enforcement owning, possessing or buying handguns not on the Mass approved list. (Such a farce)
The roster is a restriction on dealers. LEO or anyone in MA can buy anything they want not on the roster if a dealer will sell it. But there is no loophole or exemption for MA dealers when selling to law enforcement. California has a blanket exemption for police from the roster. MA does not.

Dealers must also comply with consumer safety regulations, specifically 940CMR16. Consumer safety regulations to not apply to law enforcement. In practice this means a dealer can sell a glock to law enforcement while they cannot to a random LTC holder. Glocks are on the roster but have been deemed an unsafe consumer practice to sell/transfer.

Law enforcement is exempt from the magazine capacity restriction though can only carry while on duty. But there are no exemptions for anyone, including dealers, to sell/transfer large capacity feeding devices. There are also no exemptions for the importation into the state of large capacity feeding devices. A strict reading of MGL 140 131M shows no legal way for LEO to GET a magazine over 10rds between restrictions on transfer and importation even though they are exempt

Law enforcement is exempt from the assault style firearm restrictions but again, no way to get new ones into the state.

But back to the original question, NO, there are no exemptions for LEO from the roster.
 
The roster is a restriction on dealers. LEO or anyone in MA can buy anything they want not on the roster if a dealer will sell it. But there is no loophole or exemption for MA dealers when selling to law enforcement. California has a blanket exemption for police from the roster. MA does not.

Dealers must also comply with consumer safety regulations, specifically 940CMR16. Consumer safety regulations to not apply to law enforcement. In practice this means a dealer can sell a glock to law enforcement while they cannot to a random LTC holder. Glocks are on the roster but have been deemed an unsafe consumer practice to sell/transfer.

Law enforcement is exempt from the magazine capacity restriction though can only carry while on duty. But there are no exemptions for anyone, including dealers, to sell/transfer large capacity feeding devices. There are also no exemptions for the importation into the state of large capacity feeding devices. A strict reading of MGL 140 131M shows no legal way for LEO to GET a magazine over 10rds between restrictions on transfer and importation even though they are exempt

Law enforcement is exempt from the assault style firearm restrictions but again, no way to get new ones into the state.

But back to the original question, NO, there are no exemptions for LEO from the roster.
Thanks. I looked through the whole ball of shit and couldn’t find a thing. Thanks for the help.
 
Oooohhh. An im a cop do I have special privileges question.

This could be so much better than a Reptile thread!!! 🙏🙏🙏

Edit…

Dammit Crackpot…you took the fun away!!
Damn. You are so witty and intuitive. You should open up a tarot card shop.

So what if I am?? WGAF. Am I bothering you? Damn I hope so.
 
who cares? mass cops do whatever they want with 0 repercussions.

So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.
 
The cops in my town all had signs in there yards opposing the new HR4627292094 whatever they changed the number to pending law… until the LEO carve outs were added then… poof no more signs.
According to this thread. There are no cut outs. So, that was a shot that went no where.
 
So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.

1740495748889946.jpg
 
So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.

So that wasn't redirection, right? You're saying that the corruption of the police, judge, and DA in the Read case are the cutouts, and the rest of the system is normal? Or are you saying that this corruption specifically in this case is acceptable because everyone ELSE is also corrupt? Just trying to understand here.
 
Damn. You are so witty and intuitive. You should open up a tarot card shop.

So what if I am?? WGAF. Am I bothering you? Damn I hope so.
Nothing about you bothers me.

Im not in your state anymore and as Crackpot says you have way more restrictions on your rights than I do.

So could GAF less…im here for the comedy show.

My question to you is where were your rank and file when MACOPA got up to the podium and kissed the ring on these new laws.
 
Last edited:
So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.
Not many other professions require you to swear to uphold the Constitution, uphold the laws of the land and to maintain high ethical standards. If you can't cut it princess maybe change careers and go throw keys at kids as a mall security guard 🤣
 
Nothing about you bothers me.

Im not in your state anymore and as Crackpot says you have way more restrictions on your rights than I do.

So could GAF less…im here for the comedy show.

My question to you is where were your rank and file when MACOPA got up to the podium and kissed the ring on these new laws.

one of two places

Out profilig or beating his wife
 
So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.
1740538466027.png
 
So original. Wow, as if there is no other profession that gives professional courtesy or steals from their job or employer. You folks are all angels. Probably never drink and drive. When you start digging on regular folks you quickly find out that not all is a seems, pedophiles, perverts, drunks and thieves. Take a good look in the mirror boys.

Cops always get so butt-hurt when people expect them to .. you know.. not break the law.

Straight to ad hominem insults. Classy.


There's an entire thread of cops being truly awful people, this attitude didn't come from nowhere, lots of people are genuinely furious about cops being protected as the king's men and getting special treatment.

 
I would argue that they all do. Except for the constitution part. So you have just told me that you feel as though it is perfectly fine to swindle, lie and steal from others because you haven’t sworn an oath. Yeah let me hire you. Clown. This is why almost everyone hates far right idiots. Do as I say. Not as I do.

For the record. This cupcake has done the job for 34 years without a complaint working in the toughest areas of the city. I have no intention of throwing in the towel.

Also, I don’t know one cop who has ever busted the balls of a law abiding citizen. Matter of fact. I gave a pass to a business owner who shot a thief 3 times in the back as he fled. Your issue is with the bosses. The heads of the departments and the legislature. Rank and file could care less and support 2a.
 
Nothing about you bothers me.

Im not in your state anymore and as Crackpot says you have way more restrictions on your rights than I do.

So could GAF less…im here for the comedy show.

My question to you is where were your rank and file when MACOPA got up to the podium and kissed the ring on these new laws.
 
Not many other professions require you to swear to uphold the Constitution, uphold the laws of the land and to maintain high ethical standards. If you can't cut it princess maybe change careers and go throw keys at kids as a mall security guard 🤣
What? I can't make the Plumbers I hire swear to that?
 
I do not support the new laws. Nor do rank and file. But figure heads prevail. Yes men and women who are politically appointed and have to maintain the party line or lose their jobs. I’m not one so I speak my mind. Much to the demise of my ascension to higher rank. I do and say what’s right. Regardless.
 
FYI. Nobody I know supports this. I think they should all go to jail if they commit crimes, lie, perjure. There is no place for that in this profession. Makes my job very difficult.

Harder to give passes to guys who have a had a few beers on way home. Can’t drive them anymore, call a cab, a friend or an uber. We are under constant scrutiny. Rightly so.

I would like to go back to the days where you got a kick in the ass by the beat cop who then called your parents who in turn gave you a second beating. No arrest. Good all day in my book.
 
Back
Top Bottom