If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
They wouldn't have bitched if he had it the day of the shooting.
I will support a gofundme for his legal bills if he was CCW to protect himself/students
Let's watch this story and if this is the case let us start one.
Though I agree that the law is stupid, doesn't change the fact that it is there. This teacher made a decision of what he feels is in his best interest and now has to bear the burden of being violation of that law.
Okay, But is anything that I said there untrue?
He is a science teacher, white , male,armed.
thats 4 strikes . Talk about being in enemy territory ,
He's toast.
The school district released a statement, saying "This matter is very serious and troubling, both the Newtown Public School system and the Newtown Police Department took immediate steps to address the matter. The teacher was immediately detained by security personnel."
my reply in the comments section...........
Every single parent in this school should be thanking this teacher. He cares so much for his life and the lives of his students that he was willing to risk his personal freedom and his teachers license by carrying a firearm in class. This headline would read "Hero Teacher Saves Lives" if this guy was teaching at Sandy Hook Elementary that horrible day when a mentally unstable teen went on a shooting spree in a place where he knew he would have NO RESISTANCE.... a place where the good guys can't have guns.. and the most dangerous thing in the building are children's scissors and the mystery meat surprise at lunch. why is it that you think these psychos attack Gun Free Zones?? when was the last NRA meeting mass shooting or the last Police Department Mass Shooting, or Guun Show Mass Shooting..... Mass Shooters are cowards and are looking for easy targets. This Teacher was willing to be the one to step between your child and the gunman and be the one to say "NO MORE" and end a tragedy. I call this man a Hero not a criminal. If a law is a bad law, then what type of person are you for following it.
It's not the response any of us as gun owners or Americans should have. We have the 2nd Amendment, affirmed by Heller and McDonald, and we have state and Federal laws that still directly contradict the Supreme Law of the land. Rather than this individual prove his innocence in light of a law that stands no legal basis we ought to be outraged that this kind of crap continues on such a regular basis.
Unfortunately this teacher has no defense as far as the law goes. He is guilty, no question and he will be convicted, lose his job and teaching license in CT, lose his pistol permit and his guns, will never be able to own a gun again and will likely do some time in prison. His life is ruined because he took a stand for the safety of his students and himself. I don't think any legal defense will do much, it's an open and shut case. We may want to consider a gofundme account to help his family because they just lost his income.
The only hope is if they can challenge the law itself as unconstitutional for arbitrarily denying his 2A rights. That would take years and thousands and thousands of dollars. If it goes that way then a legal fund would be good.
CT has no excuse for this law. It is arbitrary and puts students and teachers at enormous risk, as Sandy Hook proved beyond the shadow of any doubt. Liberals are too f-ing stupid to see it though so instead they will ruin this man's life. If they would train ALL school employees on self defense with pepper spray, fighting techniques and how to use common object for defense (such as fire extinguishers - very effective) they may have some moral leg to stand on because they at least would be trying. They aren't so they have no moral leg to stand on at all, they are openly and actively inviting bad guys to come kill our kids. It's about the same as the goat that they chained up in "Jurasic Park" for the T-Rex to come and gobble up for lunch.
The liberals' reasoning for creating gun free zones is as follows:
Gun owners are all inbred redneck psychopaths, therefore if we allow guns at school/other places, there will be daily shootouts between these lunatics because they cannot control themselves and take out their guns and start blasting left and right with little provocation. Since the risk of those so called law abiding gun owners going crazy over their kid's grades and impulsively shooting the teacher is much greater than the tiny risk of mass shooting, it makes sense to accept that risk.
Something like that. It's really elitism, not stupidity per se.
You really think? Teacher kills mentally disturbed youth. At the very least he would have gone before a grand jury. There would have been those that would've said he escalated the situation and turned it into a fire fight, and he would have been up on murder charges if it were proven he was responsible for any collateral damage.
After all since if he had a gun that day as a trained educator he would have been in a better position to reason with poor Adam.
What disturbs me is absent a metal detector how did the security guard know he was packing ?
The threat of all of the above will be used to deny him a trial, and he will take a deal.He is guilty, no question and he will be convicted, lose his job and teaching license in CT, lose his pistol permit and his guns, will never be able to own a gun again and will likely do some time in prison.
I know a couple local teachers who feel the same way this guy does. They are scared sh!tless because they know the current system won't do crap to protect them.
The school and State should be sued if this guy gets jacked up because of an unconstitutional law that prevents him from protecting himself in a PROVEN dangerous situation.
This just proves that at least one teacher in Newtown is not a total ****ing moron
It's not the response any of us as gun owners or Americans should have. We have the 2nd Amendment, affirmed by Heller and McDonald, and we have state and Federal laws that still directly contradict the Supreme Law of the land. Rather than this individual prove his innocence in light of a law that stands no legal basis we ought to be outraged that this kind of crap continues on such a regular basis.
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for a moment. Everybody is assuming that this guy is on the level since he is licensed to carry. Maybe he was packing with the specific intent of doing harm. Before any of you say: there aren't enough facts, let me point out that there aren't enough facts to indicate intent one way or the other and yes he is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law or until he more than likely pleads to a deal offered by the DA. (That's reality, the system that both Joe and I worked in, not the one we liked but the one that is).
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here for a moment. Everybody is assuming that this guy is on the level since he is licensed to carry. Maybe he was packing with the specific intent of doing harm. Before any of you say: there aren't enough facts, let me point out that there aren't enough facts to indicate intent one way or the other and yes he is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law or until he more than likely pleads to a deal offered by the DA. (That's reality, the system that both Joe and I worked in, not the one we liked but the one that is).
He is a moron because he outed himself, somehow. Opsec fail.
-Mike
Should. Won't. Remedy = move out of Connecticut.
while I agree with CT being a shithole and us gunowners should move out, the reality is that in 33 states he'd be in violation of the law. And of the 17 that allow it, most allow it only with permission from the school board.
NH allow adults to carry (I believe NH laws states that the ban only applies to pupils), RI requires a permit, Mass, NY, and NJ require approval of the school (good luck with that) .
in disclosure it's been a few years since I've looked up those laws so they may have changed
One problem in NH is supposedly the PR license is not 100% GFSZ compliant (because they can be issued by entities other than the PD, even though that virtually never happens) but the feds have never prosecuted anyone claiming that, god only knows though.
-Mike
(5) "Licensing authorities" means the board of police commissioners of a city or town where the board has been instituted, the chief of police or superintendent of police of other cities and towns having a regular organized police force, and, in towns where there is no chief of police or superintendent of police, it means the town clerk who may issue licenses upon the recommendation of the town sergeant, and it also means any other person or body duly authorized by the city or town charter or by state law.