• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Oregon passes 114. $65 fee to buy a gun and no more mags over 10 Rnd.

These crazy reactions to Bruen suck in the short term but will eventually pay large dividends.
Breun on its face didn't do a lot, remember the case was only to remove the "good cause" requirements that a small number of states abused.
The meat of the opinion was in setting a much clearer standard for review.
Now all of those cases that got pencil whipped with a fake review under the two step scrutiny process need to make it back through the courts to be properly evaluated
 
Aero are a bunch of fags. They will not ship a barrel to MA. I got that message a few days ago.

You lucked out.

I bought an aero upper from a 3rd party. Would not properly cycle rounds. I reached out to aero who said send it in, then I gave them my return address. They're like yeah sorry, we can't send it back to you - can we send it back to an address in a different state?

I deal with the stupidity... when I get it back it's still not completely fixed.

Lovely company to do business with. 🙄
 

Oregon’s New Gun Law Stuck in Limbo​

Stringent measure is temporarily blocked by state judge​

From today's WSJ

A tough new Oregon law set to go into effect this week has been thrown into legal limbo, leaving residents and gun dealers confused about the future of firearm sales in their state.

Passed by voters last month, Measure 114 would require residents to get permits to buy firearms and would prohibit the sale and manufacture of magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. If enacted, it would be one of the most stringent in the country.

Gun-rights groups filed a flurry of lawsuits challenging the law in federal and state courts. On Tuesday, Harney County Circuit Court Judge Robert Raschio temporarily blocked the law from going into effect, saying it violated the right to bear arms in the state constitution. That decision came hours after a federal judge said the law could go into effect.

“Everyone is basically trying to figure out what’s going on,” said Austin Cock, a manager at Tick Licker Firearms LLC, which has stores in Salem and Corvallis, Ore.

On Thursday, Ellen Rosenblum, the state’s attorney general, tried to offer some clarity to residents in a message on Twitter.

“If you’re wondering about the legal status of Measure 114, the law’s enforcement is (we hope temporarily) on hold by the state courts,” it said. “We will continue to defend the constitutionality of this voter-passed gun safety law.”

Gun-rights groups say they are confident they will prevail in tossing out the Oregon law following a U.S. Supreme Court decision in June that significantly expanded gun rights. The high court struck down New York state’s system for issuing concealed-weapons permits and set a new constitutional test for gun-control measures: They must be consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation.

“This law will not survive,” said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, which is challenging the Oregon law in court.


The Oregon law would require residents to take a safety course and pass a background check to obtain a license to purchase guns. It would also mandate background checks to be completed before a gun can be sold. Under federal law, guns can be transferred after three days if the check isn’t completed.

A handful of states such as Illinois and Connecticut require a license to buy all types of firearms. Meanwhile, 12 other states have restrictions on the size of magazines.

Researchers have found that permit-to-purchase laws are associated with lower levels of suicides, homicides and mass shootings, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Studies have also shown that restrictions on high-capacity magazines are linked to reductions in the number of people injured and killed in mass shootings, though not to the number of incidents. But states have also struggled to enforce such restrictions on magazines.

“This law will not survive,” said Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, which is challenging the Oregon law in court.


The Oregon law would require residents to take a safety course and pass a background check to obtain a license to purchase guns. It would also mandate background checks to be completed before a gun can be sold. Under federal law, guns can be transferred after three days if the check isn’t completed.

A handful of states such as Illinois and Connecticut require a license to buy all types of firearms. Meanwhile, 12 other states have restrictions on the size of magazines.

Researchers have found that permit-to-purchase laws are associated with lower levels of suicides, homicides and mass shootings, according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Studies have also shown that restrictions on high-capacity magazines are linked to reductions in the number of people injured and killed in mass shootings, though not to the number of incidents. But states have also struggled to enforce such restrictions on magazines."
 

"One interesting aspect of the Oregon Firearms Federation decision is its focus on the nature of the gun violence problem (or lack thereof) during the Founding Era. Some judges who have applied Bruen in recent months have concluded, with little analysis, that the “societal problem” sought to be addressed by modern gun regulation is essentially unchanged from problems that existed during the Founding Era....In Oregon Firearms Federation, by contrast, the judge relied on evidence submitted by the state “that there is no known occurrence of a mass shooting resulting in double-digit fatalities from the Nation’s founding in 1776 until 1948, with the first known mass shooting resulting in ten or more deaths occurring in 1949.”

This aspect interacts with the >10rd magazine ban - "double-digit fatalities" were rarely encountered in mass shootings before magazine-fed firearms were "in common use". Obviously, not an counterargument to be made by the plaintiffs, who would hold magazine with >10rd capacity are protected by the 2ndA. It's a Catch-22 the judge was clearly aware of in crafting the ruling. The goal is to make mass shootings and 10rd+ magazine a "modern" problem post-Founding Era, this freed from Bruen's historical analogy requirement. The intent s to then fall back on intermediate scrutiny.

Kopel on >10rd magazine history:

 

Oregon judge temporarily blocks voter-approved high-capacity magazine ban​


Measure 114 bans the sale, transfer, or import of gun magazines over 10 rounds for most residents​


 
Back
Top Bottom