Police respond to report of shooting at pro-Israeli protest in Newton

Not clear who got hit, I'm assuming it was the guy who charged across the street to attack (now to be know as the perp).
In that case it's a clean shoot.

And listen to the perp, 200K Palestinians killed, even Hamas isn't pushing that high a number. guy is delusional.

Guy with the gun needs more practice.
 
42! said:
Not clear who got hit, I'm assuming it was the guy who charged across the street to attack (now to be know as the perp).
In that case it's a clean shoot.
Click to expand...
Duty to retreat state... It'll be interesting how this unfolds.

The way I see it, pulling the trigger has to be both morally and legally justifiable. Morally, I think this is a case of FAFO - don't charge and attack people and you won't get shot. Legally though... in this state...
 
VigilantesLiberi said:
We have a duty to retreat law in MA?
Click to expand...
Indeed. However, there is exception if doing so would increase chance of harm to others if I read it correctly. So I think he has a good shoot...not saying they won't try to break him financially in the process
 
42! said:
Not clear who got hit, I'm assuming it was the guy who charged across the street to attack (now to be know as the perp).
In that case it's a clean shoot.

And listen to the perp, 200K Palestinians killed, even Hamas isn't pushing that high a number. guy is delusional.

Guy with the gun needs more practice.
Click to expand...
Most of those savage supporters are delusional, otherwise they wouldn't embrace the 3 x H savages.

Sorry, ALL, not most.
 
VigilantesLiberi said:
But seriously, my instructor talked about this in the class, and he said it was a gray area. I probably just wasn't listening, but I thought he said the castle doctrine does cover our vehicles.
Click to expand...
Each PD will have a greater degree of fealty to the gun grabbers the closer they get to Beacon Hill. This is not looking good for the vet imho. The neck stomping was a proper touch though.
 
DJBrad said:
Each PD will have a greater degree of fealty to the gun grabbers the closer they get to Beacon Hill. This is not looking good for the vet imho. The neck stomping was a proper touch though.
Click to expand...
I agree that the retard should have been shot, maybe even sooner. But if we look at it from a duty to retreat standpoint, then clearly the shooter failed to retreat.
 
VigilantesLiberi said:
But seriously, my instructor talked about this in the class, and he said it was a gray area. I probably just wasn't listening, but I thought he said the castle doctrine does cover our vehicles.
Click to expand...
Remember the case of the Westborough LTC holder. He was in his car and still got manslaughter in Worcester.
 
kalash said:
Duty to retreat state... It'll be interesting how this unfolds.

The way I see it, pulling the trigger has to be both morally and legally justifiable. Morally, I think this is a case of FAFO - don't charge and attack people and you won't get shot. Legally though... in this state...
Click to expand...
Hard to retreat when the guy tackles you.

That said, was there a clear threat of death and grave bodily harm?
 
Back
Top Bottom