bdb
NES Member
So hypothetically speaking if someone owned a Delta Level Defense model CT4-2A which actually has ATF variance documentation that makes it legally an "other" firearm. Their website has all the details and my understanding is the origin of the firearm was the market it certain states who have issues with the AWB and with AR pistols. So as an "other" it is legally neither a pistol or a rifle. It does come from the factory with a pistol brace, 10" or so barrel (I don't remember exact length) but it is is shorter that 16. They come without a pinned brake and also has an adjustable stock. All legal per AWB laws in MA given it's an "other" firearm. At least that is now I understand it.
So, all that said, with the recent ATF ruling on pistol braces, would it be a good idea for someone with one of these firearms to apply for the SBR stamp? Not really sure what to advise my friend how to proceed. Is the fact that the ATF considers it a "other" have any affect on the ATF pistol brace ruling? Just curious to get some thoughts from someone with more legal knowledge in this area. And yes, I get it that my buddy should talk to a lawyer and it likely will end up that way but I wanted to do a little digging.
So, all that said, with the recent ATF ruling on pistol braces, would it be a good idea for someone with one of these firearms to apply for the SBR stamp? Not really sure what to advise my friend how to proceed. Is the fact that the ATF considers it a "other" have any affect on the ATF pistol brace ruling? Just curious to get some thoughts from someone with more legal knowledge in this area. And yes, I get it that my buddy should talk to a lawyer and it likely will end up that way but I wanted to do a little digging.
Last edited: