Should the State House be Passing Legislation While Closed to the Public?

GOAL

NES Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
541
Likes
1,747
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Should the State House be Passing Legislation While Closed to the Public?

State-House-Summer-2014.jpg

The title of the article is a question that is starting to be a topic of discussion around the country. It is also not limited to the second Amendment community. We have heard rumblings from a variety of different people and groups throughout the last four or five months.

The question was further compounded in Massachusetts this past session. During my entire tenure at GOAL, and even before that, the legislature always stopped formal sessions on July 31st. At this point they would focus on elections. They still had informal sessions for innocuous bills and could call a formal for something emergency related. This past session was the first time the legislature worked until January. Even then, they worked until very early the next morning passing legislation.

The reason for staying in operation was supposedly because the budget had not been passed and emergency COVID law might have to be passed. It turned out that several other things were passed as well. None of which had any bearing on our issues, but the question remains.

One great concern is that the State House is not open to the citizens and has not been for around nine months. There also seems to be no end to this restriction in the near future. The Massachusetts State House has always been considered “The Peoples’ Building”. Especially during formal session days, the building was always alive with people and various groups “working the building” as we say. Those were the times for groups and even individual citizens to catch the attention of a great number of legislators. That is not the case any longer.

Like most businesses these days, the legislature is working remotely for the most part. A skeleton crew of staff and elected officials man the chambers while the bulk of legislators and staff are on the phones or video conferences at home. This also drastically changes the interaction between legislators themselves, but the greatest concern is still citizen access to the process. Sure, you can still make phone calls or emails, but there is no replacement for being there in person.

The other problem that appears in these conversations is, what incentive does the legislature have to fix it. If you were a legislator and no longer had to drive 2 – 3 hours each way for an 11 AM formal session that was delayed until 4 PM and lasted until midnight, would you want to open the State House as fast as you could?

Even though citizens can log on and watch these sessions on-line, currently the system is working in a little more than a bit of a vacuum right now. Is there any sign of these over-all COVID restrictions being lifted anytime soon? If there are, we have not seen them. Even federal court judge Woodlock asked in the case against Massachusetts [Can the State tell the court what temporary means, because we don’t know anymore?]

This is a major question that the citizenry and the legislature may have to grapple with a lot sooner than we may think.
 
I'm not particularly concerned with the SH being closed for the Vid, per se.

What I AM concerned about is the precedent it sets. Any sort of excuse and they could exclude the public. I've watched even GOOD people take a bad example and use it as precedent to continue bad policy. Reduce the #'s?? Maybe. Total ban??? Bad idea to even consider it.

Heck, look at what Harry Reid did to the Judiciary by pulling his stupid stunts. He made the Judicial branch more conservative than it has been in decades. All because he didn't understand unintended consequences. Same thing here. This may be fine now. And somehow, so other group decides that this was a good reason so THAT is a good reason. Reason could be a bad flu season or a riot in Springfield or the Governor's toe is acting up.
 
No, they shouldn't but what are we going to do about it? Write strongly worded letters for their circular file?
As of right now, we can't do anything without being labeled right wing extremists, insurrectionists, being persecuted, etc. The new world order has begun, don't get yourself thrown into the gulag.
 
The state house of MA shouldn't be passing legislation.
This, exactly...but alas, it is MA where everything is illegal unless it doesn't fit the ruling class's agenda...kind of like another state I'm somewhat familiar with.
 
You can bet that D's in DC are going to use the C19 excuse to kick out all media and the public, no cameras either. They can't ram through all the dictatorial crap they have planned if anyone can witness it. Just look what pencil neck did even with cameras.
 
A while back I heard a segment on the radio (NPR, no I don't listen but I heard key words as I was flipping through) about Massachusetts. The Dems were complaining that there are TOO MANY Democrat elected officials in MA and not enough Republicans. Their complaint was that it's too one-sided and they need a few R's to at least make it look like a fair system, and with such an imbalance people may start believing that the system is not working as intended.
 
Isn't now a good time to chain all the doors shut from the outside?
4uqfnc.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom