Palladin
NES Member
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
....students, educators, politicians, and activists are searching for solutions to prevent future school shootings.
1. Mass killings are rare, and mass public shootings are even rarer.
2. Many gun control measures are not likely to be helpful.
3. Public mass shooters typically have histories of mental health issues.
4. The United States does not have an extraordinary problem with mass public shootings compared to other developed countries.
5. Mass killers often find ways to kill even without firearms.
6. Australia did not “eliminate mass public shootings” by banning assault weapons.
it doesn't matter. they do not want gun control. They want control.
Agreed, my concern with this write-up, even though well done, is that #2 gives the antis more data to attempt to ban all guns. I never get into discussions about this gun did this, and this gun did that. It just leads to the inevitable comeback, "okay then, according to your data let's ban all guns". They will completely ignore the other points brought up in the other sections. I stick to the DANGER of banning guns and cite what's occurred in other countries and in the US because of such bans to support my statements.it doesn't matter. they do not want gun control. They want a complete and total gun ban.
From the CDC.....think about it....1,669 people a day die.
- Cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 480,000 deaths per year in the United States, including more than 41,000 deaths resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths every day.
- An estimated 88,0008 people (approximately 62,000 men and 26,000 women) die from alcohol-related causes annually, making alcohol the third leading preventable cause of death in the United States.
Sounds like a better place to reduce deaths.
Doctors and hospitals are bad as well:
The answers are part of the curriculum for the first Ph.D. in health care quality and patient safety program in the country — at Northwestern Medicine — which aims to prevent the annual 440,000 deaths from medical errors in the United States.
They already make up all the data they want so presenting them with facts makes no difference because their goal is to ban all guns and it always has been because the goal is control. An example of this is gun free zones, we have proof positive that they are totally ineffective at stopping mass shooters and yet they insist on keeping them.Agreed, my concern with this write-up, even though well done, is that #2 gives the antis more data to attempt to ban all guns. I never get into discussions about this gun did this, and this gun did that. It just leads to the inevitable comeback, "okay then, according to your data let's ban all guns". They will completely ignore the other points brought up in the other sections. I stick to the DANGER of banning guns and cite what's occurred in other countries and in the US because of such bans to support my statements.
They forgot number seven
7. criminals don't obey laws