They know now that an arrest based on ”restricted” carry cannot stand. That’s as of now, already, regardless of what state law or your CoP’s policies say. Meaning, could they arrest you? Sure. Would their case go anywhere? Nope.
Hey, it might go
all the way to the Supreme Court.
Each one must pick their own battles.
Leges non facimus, sententias modo urgemus
This ruling does not hold this - Place of carry is specifically called out as not being a covered subject.
So easy to understand yet you don’t?
“... Put simply, there is no historical basis for New York to effectively declare the island of Manhattan a “sensitive place” simply because it is crowded and protected generally by the New York City Police Department.”
And dig
the new NYS FAQ.
Wondering now if open carry will now be a thing in MA, since the main jist behind why no one did previously is that there was concern over the CoP considering you to be unsuitable at renewal, since OC is not illegal in MA.
![Hmm [hmmm] [hmmm]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/009.gif)
The main concern around here has always been
some snowflake calling 911 about a man with a gun.
Even the death of suitability won't change that.
There is still great risk of getting a ride you can't beat.
Then you put them on notice that while they are discussing legal options with their attorney you will be discussing your options with your attorney. Put it in writing and cc the select board or city council. The police dept. will play games but you will get the attention of the people who hold the purse strings.
Is this before or after he actually hires an actual competent firearms attorney
and gets advice on this scheme?
Will the attorney say, "if you fück around, you will find out",
or will they say, "go to town - my youngest's tuition bill comes due next month,
and you won't
believe what they're charging for diesel down at the yacht club."?
The justices have seen the erosion of law and order. They winessed the lawless agencies of the federal government collude to illegally frame a sitting Predident, with zero ramufications. I believe those on the right know they are one of the last institutions that can save this country. Or perhaps I'm just being a faggot.
Getting moved to safe houses after brooming Roe v. Wade
is gonna cause some agonizing reappraisals.
Pretty much if items are in common use by police/military I don't see how they can be banned. Maybe cane swords, poison darts, or other kind of 'assassin' hidden weapons that have 'no military purpose' per previous SCotUS rulings can be banned.
Holding out for zoobow open carry.
It is unlikely MA courts are going to interpret the SCOTUS decision as changing anything about "suitability", and only accepting that the "special need" criteria no longer applies.
The
question is whether
Federal courts will invalidate suitability
as being impermissibly subjective (and perhaps even impermissibly vague).