If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

I just had a 2014 case of possession of a stun gun. It was in default, and just brought in. As soon as I got the case I submitted a handwritten motion to dismiss based on Ramirez v. Comm., 479 Mass. 331 (2018) (invalidating M.G.L. c. 140 s. 131J as the total prohibition on civilian stungun possession is a violation of the 2nd amendment). The prosecutor offered Guilty, $750 fine prior to my handing him a copy of the motion. Needless to say, we didn't take the deal.

[QUOTE="eboos, post: 7932117, member: 61916"] I just had a 2014 case of possession of a stun gun. It was in default, and just brought in. As soon as I got the case I submitted a handwritten motion to dismiss based on Ramirez v. Comm., 479 Mass. 331 (2018) (invalidating M.G.L. c. 140 s. 131J as the total prohibition on civilian stungun possession is a violation of the 2nd amendment). The prosecutor offered Guilty, $750 fine prior to my handing him a copy of the motion. Needless to say, we didn't take the deal. [smile] [/QUOTE]

Verification