If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***

Reply to thread

Message

My predictions are not short term (<1 yr). I expect this intrastate f***ery to be quashed in 2-3 years with some form of interstate carry in the medium term (~5 years).
But before the first case asking for interstate carry recognition happens we need to stomp the "sensitive places" dodge into the smallest box we can - I don't believe it will ever go away since judges understand their court IS a public*** court and they certainly don't want people in THIER courts carrying, therefore they, including SCOTUS, will do anything necessary to keep the canard of sensitive places alive. The exception to this is that I believe the home state rule could be attacked before clearly definition of sensitive places without risk.

*** - I am clearly delineating public from private here because any private entity has the right to exclude whomever they choice for whatever reason they choose including sexist, racist scum-baggery reasoning.

<blockquote data-quote="pastera" data-source="post: 8043945" data-attributes="member: 28768">My predictions are not short term (&lt;1 yr). I expect this intrastate f***ery to be quashed in 2-3 years with some form of interstate carry in the medium term (~5 years).But before the first case asking for interstate carry recognition happens we need to stomp the &quot;sensitive places&quot; dodge into the smallest box we can - I don&#039;t believe it will ever go away since judges understand their court IS a public*** court and they certainly don&#039;t want people in THIER courts carrying, therefore they, including SCOTUS, will do anything necessary to keep the canard of sensitive places alive. The exception to this is that I believe the home state rule could be attacked before clearly definition of sensitive places without risk.*** - I am clearly delineating public from private here because any private entity has the right to exclude whomever they choice for whatever reason they choose including sexist, racist scum-baggery reasoning.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pastera, post: 8043945, member: 28768"] My predictions are not short term (<1 yr). I expect this intrastate f***ery to be quashed in 2-3 years with some form of interstate carry in the medium term (~5 years). But before the first case asking for interstate carry recognition happens we need to stomp the "sensitive places" dodge into the smallest box we can - I don't believe it will ever go away since judges understand their court IS a public*** court and they certainly don't want people in THIER courts carrying, therefore they, including SCOTUS, will do anything necessary to keep the canard of sensitive places alive. The exception to this is that I believe the home state rule could be attacked before clearly definition of sensitive places without risk. *** - I am clearly delineating public from private here because any private entity has the right to exclude whomever they choice for whatever reason they choose including sexist, racist scum-baggery reasoning. [/QUOTE]

Verification