Yeah we were getting 1500+ fps with the 125 grains so I bet those 115's are hot.
I still do not get the point of subsonic 5.56: There is not enough mass in a 55, 60, or even 75 grain bullet to do much damage at those speeds. I'm surprised that he can even get reliable cycling of the BCG at those pressures.
No AR on the planet will cycle with subsonic 5.56 loads. A subsonic 5.56 turns an AR into a straight pull bolt gun. (Of course, in theory, if you loaded up heavy enough .224 bullets to result in a subsonic round with a full powder charge, it would cycle the gun. But any bullet that heavy (guessing in the 110 gr range) would be too long to stabilize in even a 1:7 barrel. )
I agree with you that a subsonic 5.56 AR is pointless. If you want to shoot 60 gr projectiles at subsonic speed, you are far far better off with (and don't laugh) a .22 LR with the Aguila 60 grain "Sub-Sonic Sniper"
Its easier to run, it costs a fraction of what an AR costs and you can even use .22 LR cans, which cost a fraction of what 5.56 cans cost.
In summary, a subsonic .223 is a turd, not worth anyone's time. Just buy a 10/22 or a M&P 15-22.
With respect to supersonic loads through a suppressor, it is still not hearing safe, but it is nice and quiet. Of course, if you were a sniper, a can would be mask where the shot came from. But I'm not a sniper, so this benefit makes no difference to me.
Don
- - - Updated - - -
so, so true.
i need to build the 300blk upper and get some subsonic ammo.
still chasing the unicorn that is subsonic .223 that cycles. for the lulz.
At least with a subsonic .300 blk, you can throw some mass down range. Whats the heaviest .30 cal bullet that people use in .300 blk? Its got to be close to 200 gr.