• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

The IRS Is Buying Up Ammo, While The Government Intends To Make It Harder For Citizens To Acquire

IRS and Postal both have their own swat teams. Let that sink in for a minute.
So does the MBTA.

Special Operations -- Provides tactical support and handles explosive materials, with the support of 5 units:
  • Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
  • Explosive Detection Unit (EDU)
  • Patrol K-9 Unit
  • Motorcycle Unit
  • Crisis Negotiation Unit
 
I believe each agency with investigations has their own armed agents. A high school classmate was an investigator with the IRS, ow he’s with the postal service I believe. They do armed raids as part of investigations. They investigate tax fraud etc and those suspects won’t always be wealthy doctors, they may be dangerous people.

It’s probably better if each agency has their own investigations rather than give the FBI even more power and range of oversight.

You don't really need to have the IRS having friggan strike teams to conduct raids though. Get USMS to do it throw a bulletproof vest on the pencil pusher the end.

The level of redundancy between the agencies is absurd and wasteful. Like how many GS1811s do you really need that all do the same thing? ( smash door, arrest someone, collect evidence)

The enlargement of agencies to do this kinda shit was a product of 9/11 patriot act bullshit. Fed LE is like 4 times the size it was back then. And most of it is not necessary outside of USBP, really.
 
So does the MBTA.

Special Operations -- Provides tactical support and handles explosive materials, with the support of 5 units:
  • Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
  • Explosive Detection Unit (EDU)
  • Patrol K-9 Unit
  • Motorcycle Unit
  • Crisis Negotiation Unit
Which actually makes perfect sense tactically since public transportation worldwide is a very soft target for terrorism.

And they’re actually a police dept, not tax collectors or mailmen.
 
Which actually makes perfect sense tactically since public transportation worldwide is a very soft target for terrorism.
Correction: Despite still being listed on the Website, the MBTA SWAT team was reported as disbanded in 2020. My apologies.

I see two issues with an MBTA SWAT team. The first was illustrated by the "Watertown shootout." In the apprehension of Tsarnaev, so many different forces showed up, and the coordination was so bad, that there were confrontations (reportedly physical) over who would take a particular sniper position. It was resulted in a "contagious shooting" incident. Over 400 shots were fired -- none by the unarmed terrorist. The MBTA SWAT team did claim credit for the capture, though. Between the State Police SWAT teams, Boston Police SWAT team, Cambridge Police "Special Response Team," the NEMLEC SWAT team and the SEMLEC SWAT team, do we really need another overlapping one?

The second is illustrated by Uvalde. It's one thing to have a SWAT team pose to pose for pretty pictures and "familiarize themselves" (in full kit) with buildings every year or so. It's another to be led and trained to actually engage a threat. As the current service reduction demonstrates, the MBTA is a patronage haven first and a transportation agency second. If they can't staff an Operations Control Center, why should we trust them to staff a SWAT team?
 
I don't buy it, this is part of gun media/jingo hype machine. This nostrum of "buying the ammo to keep it off the market" is absurd. At least at the rates posited in the
articles.

If this is the case (or was the case during obama) then where is this secret bunker theyre storing all the ammo in? [rofl] To buy enough ammo to really disrupt the market they'd have to be buying and caching it somewhere, or buying it and then destroying it, etc.

Also 700 grand on an ammo contract is basically "a handful of dog meat. " Sure its a lot of cash but not that much in an industry sense. Assuming a cost of $300 a case for bulk 9mm (reasonable assumption at big contract wholesale these days) that's basically like 2,334 cases of 9mm ammo. At a pallet rate of 64 cases a pallet, that's literally only 37 Pallets of ammo, or like a half dozen tractor trailers of 9mm, maybe less then that depending on how dense/heavy the trailers were packed. Nothing to sneeze at but in the scope of the whole market? Basically inconsequential. Back when Walmart sold ammo they were probably moving that much shit every a week out of their distribution center(s), maybe more. And Walmart was probably only 20% of the market at a feed point.

If you told me the IRS (or insert other similarly useless federal agency here) was buying 700K/mo in ammo then I'd be more likely to buy into this tinfoil funhouse theory.

Don't get me wrong this administration is shit and we likely havent seen the worst of it yet. But this "gov buying ammo" thing is so retarded its almost like its controlled opposition disinfo designed to make gun owners and pro RKBA advocates look mentally retarded.

Think about the optics of that for a minute. Layperson NPC anti goes "See? These people are so deranged they even think that the government is buying up all the ammo so they can't buy it!!!" etc and so on.

ETA: if we put it in geographic terms if this order of 9mm was to overlap with a regional supply of ammo and you coated the northeastern US (including tri state and PA) with that ammo, you're looking at like not even a month supply tops for those gun shops. That's not hugely disruptive on anything other than a short/near term scale.

Not to mention.... most of these contracts don't collect all the ammo at once. The contract is fulfilled as the ammo is received which is rarely, if ever "all at once. Might take whoever wins it a year or two to fill it (or whatever is mandated in the contract).
You should see what FLETC burns any given day.
 
I don't buy it, this is part of gun media/jingo hype machine. This nostrum of "buying the ammo to keep it off the market" is absurd. At least at the rates posited in the
articles.
... where is this secret bunker theyre storing all the ammo in? [rofl] To buy enough ammo to really disrupt the market they'd have to be buying and caching it somewhere, or buying it and then destroying it, etc.

Also 700 grand on an ammo contract is basically ... that's basically like 2,334 cases of 9mm ammo. At a pallet rate of 64 cases a pallet, that's literally only 37 Pallets of ammo, or like a half dozen tractor trailers of 9mm, maybe less then that depending on how dense/heavy the trailers were packed.
...
Sounds like you answered your own question here. 6 tractor trailers. Maybe 12 containers. Could be sitting on a dock just about anywhere.
 
My daughter had a boyfriend in HS years ago here in SoNH. His Dad was a Homeland Security Protective Services officer. His drive was a Ford Expedition with dark windows - a knuckle knock said it had BP windows so it was hardened. Plate was a “SHIELD-1” NH plate. He had a nondescript mini-container on a pad around the side of his garage. The kid said it was “Dad’s work stuff.” They broke up before I got to know more.

Post 9-11 (like 9-12), I met many walking around the area West on Inner Harbor, standing armed guard duty with rifles and shotguns by any and every Federal building. Just street closes and badges. I had a nice chat with one retired Marshall who said he got a call and was tag-teaming in front of the Federal Reserve Bank with other retired Feds from different agencies.

USG had a call-out plan back then - just not a good one. I’m sure there’s more armed Feds all over now as well as a new call-out plan - just not a good one still.
 
Sounds like you answered your own question here. 6 tractor trailers. Maybe 12 containers. Could be sitting on a dock just about anywhere.

Not my point. That amount of ammo is inconsequential. The Jingo/tinfoiler narrative on this is that gov has been hoarding ammo, but mysteriously theres no magic facility where these
millions of rounds of market disruption are located. [rofl]
 
Not my point. That amount of ammo is inconsequential. The Jingo/tinfoiler narrative on this is that gov has been hoarding ammo, but mysteriously theres no magic facility where these
millions of rounds of market disruption are located. [rofl]
That was the point. 12 containers IS inconsequential. We're in agreement here.
 
So does the MBTA.

Special Operations -- Provides tactical support and handles explosive materials, with the support of 5 units:
  • Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
  • Explosive Detection Unit (EDU)
  • Patrol K-9 Unit
  • Motorcycle Unit
  • Crisis Negotiation Unit

It might make some sense to have the MBTA police or whatever the f*** they are calling themselves now to have these specialist teams given the extremely specialized environments they operate in. May sound silly, but tunnels, trains boats, etc bring all sorts of weird dynamics to emergency calls and having people already very familiar with those environments take on said special roads (bomb squad, swat) is probably a good thing.
 
b0a33cb677e047af32d0250ec6f00827.jpg

You don't really need to have the IRS having friggan strike teams to conduct raids though. Get USMS to do it throw a bulletproof vest on the pencil pusher the end.
7461e86979638d15a4f2c2167b092f94.jpg

It's one thing to have a SWAT team pose to pose for pretty pictures and "familiarize themselves" (in full kit) with buildings every year or so. It's another to be led and trained to actually engage a threat.
c5478908d097a42da52f4971d579226a.jpg
 

Okay, time for a little math. 700K/2200 special agents = $318 of ammo per agent. I spend about that much every 6 months, and I suspect some of you spend a lot more.

I guess Boebert doesn't want armed Federal agents to actually keep in practice with their weapons.
 
Okay, time for a little math. 700K/2200 special agents = $318 of ammo per agent. I spend about that much every 6 months, and I suspect some of you spend a lot more.

I guess Boebert doesn't want armed Federal agents to actually keep in practice with their weapons.
I think you're taking her commentary the wrong way but rather she's asking a question why we need so many armed federal agents. There's so much redundancy in federal LE its retarded.
 
I think you're taking her commentary the wrong way but rather she's asking a question why we need so many armed federal agents. There's so much redundancy in federal LE its retarded.

While having 100+ armed Federal agencies and departments is absurd, I can easily see the need for the IRS to have armed police. Social Security? Not so much. That said, do you really want a single coordinated Federal police force?
 
While having 100+ armed Federal agencies and departments is absurd, I can easily see the need for the IRS to have armed police. Social Security? Not so much. That said, do you really want a single coordinated Federal police force?
I didn't say that, what i said earlier in this thread is you look at feds with guns. 50% of those feds will never, ever be in a position where they need to use a gun in the course of employment. Irs? Not sure if serious. The irs can already ruin people just fine. More often than not USMS does most of their warrants etc anyways. It's all LE empire building jerkoff syndrome. There are easily like 4 times the number of fed agents carrying guns since 9/11 . You can consolidate most of that shit just fine. Hell 90% of the FBI is useless you could start there even.... then maybe the remainder would stick to hunting diddlers.
 
This is nothing more than an expansion of federal power with a hiring of 86,000 Socialist/Communist/Psychopathic graduates of programmed Leftist education. Neat way to instill an armed force on domestic soil. The judges are in place in many areas already. Trump was a speed-bump in their plan.
 
Okay, time for a little math. 700K/2200 special agents = $318 of ammo per agent. I spend about that much every 6 months, and I suspect some of you spend a lot more.

I guess Boebert doesn't want armed Federal agents to actually keep in practice with their weapons.

While having 100+ armed Federal agencies and departments is absurd, I can easily see the need for the IRS to have armed police. Social Security? Not so much. That said, do you really want a single coordinated Federal police force?

You know the U.S. Department of Education has a SWAT team, right?

Most federal LE functions should be done by getting a warrant, and then letting local agencies serve them. And in the name of federalism, if the local agency refuses... oh well, too bad, so sad. Maybe revisit your mission statement instead of demanding unconstitutional police power.
 
IRS Criminal Investigation Agents. They are at any of the big drug or corruption busts. The IRS is the only government agency that can seize property without due process. This is how the cars, boats, houses, airplanes and all the other stuff gets seized instantly.
 
IRS Criminal Investigation Agents. They are at any of the big drug or corruption busts. The IRS is the only government agency that can seize property without due process. This is how the cars, boats, houses, airplanes and all the other stuff gets seized instantly.
Not true, FBI and others routinely seize stuff using asset forfeiture all the time. ATF used to even have an inside motto of "Always Think Forfeiture". All they have to do is use the words "we think this was materiel or obtained from gains of criminal activity" and poof, gone leaving the accused to prove otherwise.
 
IRS Criminal Investigation Agents. They are at any of the big drug or corruption busts. The IRS is the only government agency that can seize property without due process. This is how the cars, boats, houses, airplanes and all the other stuff gets seized instantly.
When I was at FLETC, Sally's Cop Shop sold t-shirts saying, "IRS CID: Your Worst Nightmare. An Accountant With a Badge and a Gun"
 
You know the U.S. Department of Education has a SWAT team, right?
No, and it never has. That bit of folklore came out of a 2011 raid, but was quickly walked back by the news reporters who got it wrong. They do have officers armed with shotguns, though. In 2020, the GAO published a list of Federal non-military tactical teams. It included two teams under the Department of Energy, and even Amtrak has a SWAT team, but not Education:


Most federal LE functions should be done by getting a warrant, and then letting local agencies serve them. And in the name of federalism, if the local agency refuses... oh well, too bad, so sad. Maybe revisit your mission statement instead of demanding unconstitutional police power.
As we've seen in various states, including here in Massachusetts, cooperation by LEO's is far from assured. And on Federal lands, local agencies don't have any jurisdiction.
 
Back
Top Bottom